Hi,
On 04/08/2015 04:01, Yan, Zheng wrote:> Hi Loic.
>
> Yes, https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5222 is problematic. Do you mean
> should we include these RPs in v0.94.3? These RPs fix a bug in rare
> configure, I think it’s not a big deal to not include it in v0.94.3
Both https://github.c
Hi Loic.
Yes, https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5222 is problematic. Do you mean should
we include these RPs in v0.94.3? These RPs fix a bug in rare configure, I
think it’s not a big deal to not include it in v0.94.3
Regards
Yan, Zheng
> On Aug 4, 2015, at 00:32, Loic Dachary wrote:
>
>
Hi Greg,
I assume the "file handle reference counting" is about
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12088 which is backported as described at
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12319. It was indeed somewhat problematic and
required two pull requests: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5222 (authored by
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 6:43 PM Loic Dachary wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/hammer
> passed the fs suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11990#fs). Do you think
> it is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
I'm on vacati
Hi Greg,
The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/hammer
passed the fs suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11990#fs). Do you think it
is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
Cheers
P.S. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11990#Release-information has di
