On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
I certainly wouldn't recommend it, but there are probably use cases where
it makes sense (i.e., the data isn't as important as the performance).
This would make a lot of sense for e.g. service orchestration-style
setups where
Hi,
Recent tests on my test rack with 20G IB(iboip, 64k mtu, default
CUBIC, CFQ, LSI SAS 2108 w/ wb cache) interconnect shows a quite
fantastic performance - on both reads and writes Ceph completely
utilizing all disk bandwidth as high as 0.9 of theoretical limit of
sum of all bandwidths bearing
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Andrey Korolyov wrote:
Hi,
Recent tests on my test rack with 20G IB(iboip, 64k mtu, default
CUBIC, CFQ, LSI SAS 2108 w/ wb cache) interconnect shows a quite
fantastic performance - on both reads and writes Ceph completely
utilizing all disk bandwidth as high as 0.9 of
On 10/10/2012 09:23 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Andrey Korolyov wrote:
Hi,
Recent tests on my test rack with 20G IB(iboip, 64k mtu, default
CUBIC, CFQ, LSI SAS 2108 w/ wb cache) interconnect shows a quite
fantastic performance - on both reads and writes Ceph completely
utilizing