On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Yehuda Sadeh yeh...@inktank.com wrote:
Well, practically I'd like to have such work doing baby steps, rather
than swiping changes. Such changes have higher chances of getting
completed and eventually merged upstream. That's why I prefer the
current model of
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Yehuda Sadeh yeh...@inktank.com wrote:
I was referring to your work at wip-rgw-plugin, where the plugin code
itself still needs to rely on the rgw utility code.
Right. So we can agree on ditching the dynamic loading thing and clean
internal API (for now), but at
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Roald van Loon roaldvanl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Yehuda Sadeh yeh...@inktank.com wrote:
I was referring to your work at wip-rgw-plugin, where the plugin code
itself still needs to rely on the rgw utility code.
Right. So we can
Hi,
I started out by defining the plugin system a bit more
(http://wiki.ceph.com/01Planning/02Blueprints/Emperor/rgw:_plugin_architecture).
I'd really appreciate any comments.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Yehuda Sadeh yeh...@inktank.com wrote:
- AUTH (Authentication backends):
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Roald van Loon roaldvanl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I started out by defining the plugin system a bit more
(http://wiki.ceph.com/01Planning/02Blueprints/Emperor/rgw:_plugin_architecture).
I'd really appreciate any comments.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:40 PM,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Roald van Loon roaldvanl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Yehuda,
Thanks for the comments.
Yeah, I created the wip-rgw-plugin to get a feeling of how it would
look like. It's probably better to see it as a sandbox, but it already
clearly shows some of the flaws that
Hi all,
For those interested;
http://wiki.ceph.com/01Planning/02Blueprints/Emperor/rgw:_plugin_architecture
I know a plugin architecture is a sensitive subject for a lot of
people (it is for me at least), but I think it might be worthwhile
discussing it.
Please comment/flame away :-)
Roald
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:57 AM, Roald van Loon roaldvanl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
For those interested;
http://wiki.ceph.com/01Planning/02Blueprints/Emperor/rgw:_plugin_architecture
I know a plugin architecture is a sensitive subject for a lot of
people (it is for me at least), but I
I most definitely agree, that's why I think a lightweight and
extensible solution would be best. No big interface description but
just a simple loader function with parameters depending on the type of
'plugin'. If we need another type of plugin, we can add that later on
(of course, we have to be
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Roald van Loon roaldvanl...@gmail.com wrote:
I most definitely agree, that's why I think a lightweight and
extensible solution would be best. No big interface description but
just a simple loader function with parameters depending on the type of
'plugin'. If
10 matches
Mail list logo
