Somnath Roy
> Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Regarding op_t, local_t
>
> Good catch. I think it does make sense.
>
> 2015-11-19 9:54 GMT+08:00 Somnath Roy :
>> Hi Sage,
>> I saw we are now having single transaction in submit_transaction. But,
>> i
well , reducing one transaction would help there.
Thanks & Regards
Somnath
-Original Message-
From: 池信泽 [mailto:xmdx...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 6:00 PM
To: Somnath Roy
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regarding op_t, local_t
Good catch. I think it doe
Good catch. I think it does make sense.
2015-11-19 9:54 GMT+08:00 Somnath Roy :
> Hi Sage,
> I saw we are now having single transaction in submit_transaction. But,
> in the replication path we are still having two transaction, can't we merge
> it to one there ?
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Somnath
> --
Hi Sage,
I saw we are now having single transaction in submit_transaction. But,
in the replication path we are still having two transaction, can't we merge it
to one there ?
Thanks & Regards
Somnath
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message
Hi Sage,
I saw we are now having single transaction in submit_transaction. But,
in the replication path we are still having two transaction, can't we
merge it to one there ?
Thanks & Regards
Somnath
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message t
