Sage Weil wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Alex Elsayed wrote:
Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Alex,
On 17/08/2015 22:19, Alex Elsayed wrote:
snip
This is where I see a subtle, but meaningful distinction: Accepting
from aliases *which have submitted a DCO* means that the person behind
the
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Alex Elsayed wrote:
Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Alex,
On 17/08/2015 22:19, Alex Elsayed wrote:
snip
This is where I see a subtle, but meaningful distinction: Accepting from
aliases *which have submitted a DCO* means that the person behind the
alias, even if we
On 17/08/2015 22:58, Alex Elsayed wrote:
The S-o-B tag, then, simply says If you look, you'll find my affirmation of
intent to follow the DCO - it is not, in itself, anything other than a
pointer. This prevents people from copypasta'ing the S-o-B line as a magic
incantation, without
Loic Dachary wrote:
On 17/08/2015 22:58, Alex Elsayed wrote:
The S-o-B tag, then, simply says If you look, you'll find my affirmation
of intent to follow the DCO - it is not, in itself, anything other than
a pointer. This prevents people from copypasta'ing the S-o-B line as a
magic
Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Joao,
snipping quite a bit
It is quite impossible for us (non lawyers) to draw the line that
separates paranoïa and common sense. Reason why most discussions on these
topics turn short. I cannot dismiss the scenario you describe and I'm
quite sure asking a lawyer
Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Alex,
On 17/08/2015 22:19, Alex Elsayed wrote:
snip
This is where I see a subtle, but meaningful distinction: Accepting from
aliases *which have submitted a DCO* means that the person behind the
alias, even if we don't know their name, has bound themselves to a
Hi Alex,
On 17/08/2015 22:19, Alex Elsayed wrote:
Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Joao,
snipping quite a bit
It is quite impossible for us (non lawyers) to draw the line that
separates paranoïa and common sense. Reason why most discussions on these
topics turn short. I cannot dismiss the
On 08/12/2015 01:51 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 12/08/2015 12:54, Gregory Farnum wrote:
I won't be merging any code with obvious aliases for exactly the
reasons John mentions. Obviously IANAL, but I think you'll find law
proceedings in the USA would look much less kindly on accepting
a Signed-off-by does, I would also be against using
aliases. In reality a Signed-off-by is nothing more than a convenient mean to
get in touch with someone who claimed to be the author of a patch.
The companies making and distributing Free Software using Signed-off-by like
Ceph does, do
a real name policy.
If that was indeed what a Signed-off-by does, I would also be against using
aliases. In reality a Signed-off-by is nothing more than a convenient mean
to get in touch with someone who claimed to be the author of a patch.
The companies making and distributing Free Software
On 08/01/2015 09:11 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 07/31/2015 09:59 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Ceph,
We require that each commit has a Signed-off-by line with the name and email
of the author. The general idea is that the Ceph project trusts each
developer to understand what it
On 07/31/2015 09:59 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Ceph,
We require that each commit has a Signed-off-by line with the name and email
of the author. The general idea is that the Ceph project trusts each
developer to understand what it entails[1]. There is no formal verification :
the person
Hi Ceph,
We require that each commit has a Signed-off-by line with the name and email of
the author. The general idea is that the Ceph project trusts each developer to
understand what it entails[1]. There is no formal verification : the person
submitting the patch could use a fake name or
Hi Richard,
I met with Benjamin Jean and two other lawyers (their names escape me, my
apologies) while at http://solutionlinux.fr/ and asked for their opinion. They
suggested that if a contributor wants to remain anonymous to the general public
while being easily reachable if needed, she/he
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 07:06:04PM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Richard,
I met with Benjamin Jean and two other lawyers (their names escape me, my
apologies) while at http://solutionlinux.fr/ and asked for their opinion.
They suggested that if a contributor wants to remain anonymous to
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 07:31:59AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
However, I know of at least one other instance where finding a way
to handle aliases would allow contributors to participate in the
Ceph project. OVH is a large hosting company employing a number of
developers and management
Hi Richard,
It was nice seeing you at the OpenStack summit. Do not hesitate to redirect if
this question is best answered by someone else at RedHat. As most of us I'm
still unsure who at RedHat has time to devote to Ceph ;-)
Koleos Fuskus koleosfus...@yahoo.com would like to contribute code
On 19/05/2014 17:27, Koleos Fuskus wrote:
Please notice that the complete alias is koleosfuscus with c and not k
and I include a space when the forms ask me for name and family name.
Sorry about that : it is fixed in the Reported-by: at
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/1824
Cheers
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 08:27:54AM -0700, Koleos Fuskus wrote:
Please notice that the complete alias is koleosfuscus with c and not k
and I include a space when the forms ask me for name and family name. Anyway,
I
would like to receive advice on this topic. It may be convenient for me to do
Hi Richard,
Thanks for your input !
I don't think koleosfuscus will have an issue using its real name. However, I
know of at least one other instance where finding a way to handle aliases would
allow contributors to participate in the Ceph project. OVH is a large hosting
company employing a
20 matches
Mail list logo
