Re: rados_dll: A Windows port of librados

2015-03-24 Thread Ketor D
Hi Alistair, I think you just import my code from ceph-dokan and don't know where is the most difficulties in merging upstream ceph. File structure is not problem, the difficulties is the code in include/common/msg/osd/mon/mds is very different from upstream. If I try to merge ceph-d

Re: rados_dll: A Windows port of librados

2015-03-24 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Alistair Israel wrote: > Thank you Loïc and Sage for the encouragement! > > Yes, we'll look into CMake if it simplifies managing the build. > However, a "stretch goal" is to possibly have the same autotools build > scripts generate .exe and .dll files from the same

Re: rados_dll: A Windows port of librados

2015-03-24 Thread Alistair Israel
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Ketor D wrote: > And also Alistair, would you like to help port your librados code > to ceph-dokan project with a clean pull request? Hi, Ketor! At this point we figured it'd easier in both the short term (and better long-term) to just start merging changes int

Re: rados_dll: A Windows port of librados

2015-03-24 Thread Alistair Israel
Thank you Loïc and Sage for the encouragement! Yes, we'll look into CMake if it simplifies managing the build. However, a "stretch goal" is to possibly have the same autotools build scripts generate .exe and .dll files from the same source files (it at all feasible or desirable). So, that's at lea

Re: rados_dll: A Windows port of librados

2015-03-19 Thread Ketor D
Hi Sage, I read the the rados_dll code and in my option it is very similar to ceph-dokan, like just add librados code to ceph-dokan. It's very easy to implement librados, librbd in ceph-dokan, because all base code is ported to MinGW. I update the ceph-dokan from 0.67 to 0.92 for a

Re: rados_dll: A Windows port of librados

2015-03-19 Thread Sage Weil
Hi Alistair, On Thu, 19 Mar 2015, Alistair Israel wrote: > Hi, ceph. > > We are pleased to announce our first milestone in bringing Ceph to the > Windows platform, by porting librados into rados.dll. > > https://github.com/AcalephStorage/rados_dll This is exciting! > Many thanks to dke...@gma

Re: rados_dll: A Windows port of librados

2015-03-19 Thread Loic Dachary
Hi, On 19/03/2015 06:35, Alistair Israel wrote: > Hi, ceph. > > We are pleased to announce our first milestone in bringing Ceph to the > Windows platform, by porting librados into rados.dll. > > https://github.com/AcalephStorage/rados_dll > > Many thanks to dke...@gmail.com and the ceph-dokan p

rados_dll: A Windows port of librados

2015-03-18 Thread Alistair Israel
Hi, ceph. We are pleased to announce our first milestone in bringing Ceph to the Windows platform, by porting librados into rados.dll. https://github.com/AcalephStorage/rados_dll Many thanks to dke...@gmail.com and the ceph-dokan project for providing the springboard and early consultation with

Re: Windows port

2013-01-09 Thread Matt W. Benjamin
, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Dino Yancey > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am also curious if a Windows port, specifically the client-side, > is > > > on the roadmap. > > > > This is somewhat OT from the original post, but if all you're >

Re: Windows port

2013-01-09 Thread Sage Weil
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Florian Haas wrote: > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Dino Yancey wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am also curious if a Windows port, specifically the client-side, is > > on the roadmap. > > This is somewhat OT from the original post, but if all you&#

Re: Windows port

2013-01-09 Thread Florian Haas
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Dino Yancey wrote: > Hi, > > I am also curious if a Windows port, specifically the client-side, is > on the roadmap. This is somewhat OT from the original post, but if all you're interested is using RBD block storage from Windows, you can already

Re: Windows port

2013-01-08 Thread Nick Couchman
>> expecting to find such an awesome and state of the art project. >> Congratulations for the great work! >> >> Please I would like to know if a Windows port is imagined for the >> future or if that is a dead-end. By Windows port I mean an abstraction >> layer

Re: Windows port

2013-01-08 Thread Gregory Farnum
atulations for the great work! > > Please I would like to know if a Windows port is imagined for the > future or if that is a dead-end. By Windows port I mean an abstraction > layer for hardware/sockets/threading/etc and building with Visual C++ > 2012 Express. And then have this state of

Re: Windows port

2013-01-08 Thread Dino Yancey
Hi, I am also curious if a Windows port, specifically the client-side, is on the roadmap. Dino On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Cesar Mello wrote: > Hi, > > I have been playing with ceph and reading the docs/thesis the last > couple of nights just to learn something during my vac

Re: Windows port

2013-01-07 Thread Cesar Mello
Hi, I have been playing with ceph and reading the docs/thesis the last couple of nights just to learn something during my vacation. I was not expecting to find such an awesome and state of the art project. Congratulations for the great work! Please I would like to know if a Windows port is