On 02/02/2015 01:06 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 06:31:16AM +, Al Viro wrote:
And at that point we finally can make sb_lock and super_blocks static in
fs/super.c. Do you want that in your tree, or would you rather have it
done via vfs.git during the merge window
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 06:31:16AM +, Al Viro wrote:
And at that point we finally can make sb_lock and super_blocks static in
fs/super.c. Do you want that in your tree, or would you rather have it
done via vfs.git during the merge window after your tree goes in? It's
as trivial as this:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 02:08:18PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 01/14/2015 02:42 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
The first 8 patches are unchanged from the series posted a week ago and
cleans up how we use the backing_dev_info structure in preparation for
fixing the life time rules for it. The
On 01/14/2015 02:42 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
The first 8 patches are unchanged from the series posted a week ago and
cleans up how we use the backing_dev_info structure in preparation for
fixing the life time rules for it. The most important change is to
split the unrelated nommu mmap flags
The first 8 patches are unchanged from the series posted a week ago and
cleans up how we use the backing_dev_info structure in preparation for
fixing the life time rules for it. The most important change is to
split the unrelated nommu mmap flags from it, but it also remove a
backing_dev_info
The first 8 patches are unchanged from the series posted a week ago and
cleans up how we use the backing_dev_info structure in preparation for
fixing the life time rules for it. The most important change is to
split the unrelated nommu mmap flags from it, but it also remove a
backing_dev_info
