On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Alexandre Oliva ol...@gnu.org wrote:
On Dec 18, 2013, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Alexandre Oliva ol...@gnu.org wrote:
Here's an updated version of the patch, that makes it much faster than
the earlier version,
On Dec 19, 2013, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Alexandre Oliva ol...@gnu.org wrote:
On Dec 18, 2013, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Alexandre Oliva ol...@gnu.org wrote:
Here's an updated version of the
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Alexandre Oliva ol...@gnu.org wrote:
On Feb 20, 2013, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Alexandre Oliva ol...@gnu.org wrote:
It recently occurred to me that I messed up an OSD's storage, and
decided that the easiest way to
On Dec 18, 2013, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Alexandre Oliva ol...@gnu.org wrote:
Here's an updated version of the patch, that makes it much faster than
the earlier version, particularly when the gap between the latest osdmap
known by the osd and
On Feb 20, 2013, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Alexandre Oliva ol...@gnu.org wrote:
It recently occurred to me that I messed up an OSD's storage, and
decided that the easiest way to bring it back was to roll it back to an
earlier snapshot I'd taken
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Alexandre Oliva ol...@gnu.org wrote:
It recently occurred to me that I messed up an OSD's storage, and
decided that the easiest way to bring it back was to roll it back to an
earlier snapshot I'd taken (along the lines of clustersnap) and let it
recover from
