irtio-scsi,iothreads,)
I have planned to take 1month for benchmark, so I hope I'll help.
- Mail original -
De: "Stefan Priebe"
À: "aderumier"
Cc: "Mark Nelson" , "ceph-devel"
Envoyé: Mardi 17 Février 2015 10:15:09
Objet: Re: speed dec
ptr::append(char
const*, unsigned int)
Stefan
>
>
>
> - Mail original -
> De: "Stefan Priebe"
> À: "aderumier"
> Cc: "Mark Nelson" , "ceph-devel"
>
> Envoyé: Lundi 16 Février 2015 23:08:37
> Objet: Re: speed decrease si
I think that perf report should show the difference, this is strange that you
have almost same result in your perf reports.
- Mail original -
De: "Stefan Priebe"
À: "aderumier"
Cc: "Mark Nelson" , "ceph-devel"
Envoyé: Lundi 16 Février 2015 2
esult of higher CPU load of the ceph-osd
processes under firefly.
Dumpling 180% per process vs. firefly 220%
Stefan
> ?
>
>
> - Mail original -
> De: "Stefan Priebe"
> À: "Mark Nelson" , "ceph-devel"
>
> Envoyé: Lundi 16 Février
voyé: Lundi 16 Février 2015 22:22:01
Objet: Re: speed decrease since firefly,giant,hammer the 2nd try
I've now upgraded server side and client side to latest upstream/firefly.
This results in fio-rbd showing avg 26000 iop/s instead of 30500 iop/s
while running dumpling...
Greets,
Stefa
t;
À: "aderumier"
Cc: "Mark Nelson" , "ceph-devel"
Envoyé: Lundi 16 Février 2015 20:10:16
Objet: Re: speed decrease since firefly,giant,hammer the 2nd try
Am 16.02.2015 um 16:36 schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER:
> What is you fio command line ?
fio rbd or fio under
I've now upgraded server side and client side to latest upstream/firefly.
This results in fio-rbd showing avg 26000 iop/s instead of 30500 iop/s
while running dumpling...
Greets,
Stefan
Am 15.02.2015 um 19:40 schrieb Stefan Priebe:
Hi Mark,
what's next?
I've this test cluster only for 2 mor
s in latest
git for both.
But it looks read related not write related - isn't it?
Stefan
- Mail original -
De: "Stefan Priebe"
À: "aderumier"
Cc: "Mark Nelson" , "ceph-devel"
Envoyé: Lundi 16 Février 2015 15:50:56
Objet: Re: speed decre
under qemu better results.
Stefan
- Mail original -
De: "Stefan Priebe"
À: "aderumier"
Cc: "Mark Nelson" , "ceph-devel"
Envoyé: Lundi 16 Février 2015 15:50:56
Objet: Re: speed decrease since firefly,giant,hammer the 2nd try
Hi Mark,
Hi A
el"
Envoyé: Lundi 16 Février 2015 15:50:56
Objet: Re: speed decrease since firefly,giant,hammer the 2nd try
Hi Mark,
Hi Alexandre,
Am 16.02.2015 um 10:11 schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> I could be interesting to see if you have the same speed decrease with
>
ceph-devel"
Envoyé: Lundi 16 Février 2015 15:50:56
Objet: Re: speed decrease since firefly,giant,hammer the 2nd try
Hi Mark,
Hi Alexandre,
Am 16.02.2015 um 10:11 schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> I could be interesting to see if you have the same speed decrease
"Stefan Priebe"
À: "Mark Nelson" , "ceph-devel"
Envoyé: Dimanche 15 Février 2015 19:40:45
Objet: Re: speed decrease since firefly,giant,hammer the 2nd try
Hi Mark,
what's next?
I've this test cluster only for 2 more days.
Here some perf Details:
dumpl
ets,
Stefan
> - Mail original -
> De: "Stefan Priebe"
> À: "Mark Nelson" , "ceph-devel"
>
> Envoyé: Dimanche 15 Février 2015 19:40:45
> Objet: Re: speed decrease since firefly,giant,hammer the 2nd try
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> what's ne
Priebe"
À: "Mark Nelson" , "ceph-devel"
Envoyé: Dimanche 15 Février 2015 19:40:45
Objet: Re: speed decrease since firefly,giant,hammer the 2nd try
Hi Mark,
what's next?
I've this test cluster only for 2 more days.
Here some perf Details:
dumpling:
12,65%
Hi Mark,
what's next?
I've this test cluster only for 2 more days.
Here some perf Details:
dumpling:
12,65% libc-2.13.so [.] 0x79000
2,86% libc-2.13.so [.] malloc
2,80% kvm [.] 0xb59c5
2,59% libc-2.13.so [.] free
2,35% [ker
d - i've never noticed before on any ceph
system. All writes are hanging - while using the same kernel as everywhere.
Stefan
>
> could we give us an hint.
>
>
> - Mail original -
> De: "Stefan Priebe"
> À: "ceph-devel"
> Envoyé: Mardi 10 Fé
between dumpling and firefly,
http://gitbuilder.ceph.com/ceph-deb-wheezy-x86_64-basic/ref/
could we give us an hint.
- Mail original -
De: "Stefan Priebe"
À: "ceph-devel"
Envoyé: Mardi 10 Février 2015 19:55:26
Objet: speed decrease since firefly,giant,hammer the 2nd t
De: "Mark Nelson"
À: "Stefan Priebe" , "ceph-devel"
Envoyé: Mardi 10 Février 2015 22:38:07
Objet: Re: speed decrease since firefly,giant,hammer the 2nd try
On 02/10/2015 03:11 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
>
> mhm i installed librbd1-dbg and librados2-dbg -
Priebe"
À: "Mark Nelson" , "ceph-devel"
Envoyé: Mercredi 11 Février 2015 06:42:21
Objet: Re: speed decrease since firefly,giant,hammer the 2nd try
Am 11.02.2015 um 05:45 schrieb Mark Nelson:
> On 02/10/2015 04:18 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
>>
>> Am 10.0
Am 11.02.2015 um 05:45 schrieb Mark Nelson:
On 02/10/2015 04:18 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Am 10.02.2015 um 22:38 schrieb Mark Nelson:
On 02/10/2015 03:11 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
mhm i installed librbd1-dbg and librados2-dbg - but the output still
looks useless to me. Should i upload it some
On 02/10/2015 04:18 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Am 10.02.2015 um 22:38 schrieb Mark Nelson:
On 02/10/2015 03:11 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
mhm i installed librbd1-dbg and librados2-dbg - but the output still
looks useless to me. Should i upload it somewhere?
Meh, if it's all just symbols it's pr
Am 10.02.2015 um 22:38 schrieb Mark Nelson:
On 02/10/2015 03:11 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
mhm i installed librbd1-dbg and librados2-dbg - but the output still
looks useless to me. Should i upload it somewhere?
Meh, if it's all just symbols it's probably not that helpful.
I've summarized your
On 02/10/2015 03:11 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
mhm i installed librbd1-dbg and librados2-dbg - but the output still
looks useless to me. Should i upload it somewhere?
Meh, if it's all just symbols it's probably not that helpful.
I've summarized your results here:
1 concurrent 4k write (libaio,
Am 10.02.2015 um 21:36 schrieb Mark Nelson:
On 02/10/2015 02:24 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Am 10.02.2015 um 20:40 schrieb Mark Nelson:
On 02/10/2015 01:13 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Am 10.02.2015 um 20:10 schrieb Mark Nelson:
On 02/10/2015 12:55 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Hello,
last year in ju
On 02/10/2015 02:24 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Am 10.02.2015 um 20:40 schrieb Mark Nelson:
On 02/10/2015 01:13 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Am 10.02.2015 um 20:10 schrieb Mark Nelson:
On 02/10/2015 12:55 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Hello,
last year in june i already reported this but there was no r
Am 10.02.2015 um 20:40 schrieb Mark Nelson:
On 02/10/2015 01:13 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Am 10.02.2015 um 20:10 schrieb Mark Nelson:
On 02/10/2015 12:55 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Hello,
last year in june i already reported this but there was no real result.
(http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/cep
On 02/10/2015 01:13 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Am 10.02.2015 um 20:10 schrieb Mark Nelson:
On 02/10/2015 12:55 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Hello,
last year in june i already reported this but there was no real result.
(http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2014-July/041070.html)
Am 10.02.2015 um 20:10 schrieb Mark Nelson:
On 02/10/2015 12:55 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Hello,
last year in june i already reported this but there was no real result.
(http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2014-July/041070.html)
I then had the hope that this will be fixed it
Am 10.02.2015 um 20:05 schrieb Gregory Farnum:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Hello,
last year in june i already reported this but there was no real result.
(http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2014-July/041070.html)
I then had the hope that this will b
On 02/10/2015 12:55 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Hello,
last year in june i already reported this but there was no real result.
(http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2014-July/041070.html)
I then had the hope that this will be fixed itself when hammer is
released. Now i tried hamme
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> last year in june i already reported this but there was no real result.
> (http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2014-July/041070.html)
>
> I then had the hope that this will be fixed itself when hammer is released.
Hello,
last year in june i already reported this but there was no real result.
(http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2014-July/041070.html)
I then had the hope that this will be fixed itself when hammer is
released. Now i tried hammer an the results are bad as before.
Since f
32 matches
Mail list logo
