On Wed, 4 Mar 2015, Thomas Lemarchand wrote:
> Thanks to all Ceph developers for the good work !
>
> I see some love given to CephFS. When will you consider CephFS to be
> production ready ?
The key missing piece is fsck (check and repair). That's where our
efforts are focused now. I think inf
Thanks to all Ceph developers for the good work !
I see some love given to CephFS. When will you consider CephFS to be
production ready ?
I use CephFS in production since Giant, and apart from the "cache
pressure health warning" bug, now resolved, I didn't have a single
problem.
--
Thomas Lemar
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015, Sage Weil wrote:
> I forgot to mention a very important note for those running the v0.92
> development release and upgrading:
>
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Sage Weil wrote:
> > Upgrading
> > -
>
> * If you are upgrading from v0.92, you must stop all OSD daemons and flush
I forgot to mention a very important note for those running the v0.92
development release and upgrading:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Sage Weil wrote:
> Upgrading
> -
* If you are upgrading from v0.92, you must stop all OSD daemons and flush their
journals (``ceph-osd -i NNN --flush-journal'')
Am 27.02.2015 um 23:10 schrieb Sage Weil:
> This is the first release candidate for Hammer, and includes all
> of the features that will be present in the final release. We
> welcome and encourage any and all testing in non-production
> clusters to identify any problems with functionality, stabili
This is the first release candidate for Hammer, and includes all of
the features that will be present in the final release. We welcome
and encourage any and all testing in non-production clusters to identify
any problems with functionality, stability, or performance before the
final Hammer release
