Re: [ceph-users] Ceph on RHEL 7 using teuthology

2014-11-10 Thread Loic Dachary
Hi, It looks like there are broken packages on the target machine even before teuthology tries to install new packages. Do you see similar errors when trying to install a package manually ? Cheers On 10/11/2014 09:59, Sarang G wrote: Hi, 1. Created an instance on AWS using AMI:

warning: parallel make check just merged

2014-11-10 Thread Loic Dachary
Hi Ceph, https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/2750 was merged a few minutes ago and make -j4 should now work (see http://dachary.org/?p=3313 for more information). A few things are done differently but nothing that require a change in how unit tests are written or run. The change primarily was

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph on RHEL 7 using teuthology

2014-11-10 Thread Loic Dachary
On 10/11/2014 12:19, Sarang G wrote: Yes. I see similar package dependency when installing manually. Can --fix-broken resolve this ? ~Pras On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org mailto:l...@dachary.org wrote: Hi, It looks like there are broken

Re: Ceph Cinder HA

2014-11-10 Thread Giulio Fidente
On 11/10/2014 11:51 AM, Loic Dachary wrote: On 10/11/2014 11:34, Sebastien Han wrote: Indeed, that’s what we discussed with Giulio, using HAProxy for the Monitors is a bit overkill since the client is natively able to switch between different monitor source. Loic, maybe you can elaborate a

RE: ObjectStore collections

2014-11-10 Thread Xue, Chendi
Made some changes: BufferTransaction::buffers is now using map coll_t, ghobject_t, mappairprefix, key, bufferlist to records IOs in one transaction, codes is under test with 700s seq write 64k and 700s random write 4k without osd crash. Best Regards, -Chendi -Original Message-

ceph branch status

2014-11-10 Thread ceph branch robot
-- All Branches -- Alfredo Deza alfredo.d...@inktank.com 2014-07-08 13:58:35 -0400 wip-8679 2014-09-04 13:58:14 -0400 wip-8366 2014-10-13 11:10:10 -0400 wip-9730 2014-11-03 10:40:45 -0500 wip-5900 Andreas-Joachim Peters andreas.joachim.pet...@cern.ch

Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] fs: add a flag for per-operation O_DSYNC semantics

2014-11-10 Thread Sage Weil
On Wed, 5 Nov 2014, Milosz Tanski wrote: From: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de With the new read/write with flags syscalls we can support a flag to enable O_DSYNC semantics on a per-operation basis. This ?s useful to implement protocols like SMB, NFS or SCSI that have such per-operation

Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] vfs: RWF_NONBLOCK flag for preadv2

2014-11-10 Thread Sage Weil
On Wed, 5 Nov 2014, Milosz Tanski wrote: generic_file_read_iter() supports a new flag RWF_NONBLOCK which says that we only want to read the data if it's already in the page cache. Additionally, there are a few filesystems that we have to specifically bail early if RWF_NONBLOCK because the op

Re: Ceph Cinder HA

2014-11-10 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Giulio Fidente gfide...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/10/2014 11:51 AM, Loic Dachary wrote: On 10/11/2014 11:34, Sebastien Han wrote: Indeed, that’s what we discussed with Giulio, using HAProxy for the Monitors is a bit overkill since the client is natively able

[PATCH v6 7/7] fs: add a flag for per-operation O_DSYNC semantics

2014-11-10 Thread Milosz Tanski
From: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de With the new read/write with flags syscalls we can support a flag to enable O_DSYNC semantics on a per-operation basis. This іs useful to implement protocols like SMB, NFS or SCSI that have such per-operation flags. Example program below: cat pwritev2.c

[PATCH v6 4/7] vfs: RWF_NONBLOCK flag for preadv2

2014-11-10 Thread Milosz Tanski
generic_file_read_iter() supports a new flag RWF_NONBLOCK which says that we only want to read the data if it's already in the page cache. Additionally, there are a few filesystems that we have to specifically bail early if RWF_NONBLOCK because the op would block. Christoph Hellwig contributed

Re: Pull requests : speed up the reviews

2014-11-10 Thread Loic Dachary
Hi Greg, On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Gregory Farnum wrote: I suppose one way of handling this might be to ask everybody to dedicate a small amount of time to reviews (as you suggest), but to emphasize PR management as much as doing the actual review. 1) If you don't have assigned PRs, look at the

radosgw buffer overflow

2014-11-10 Thread Mustafa Muhammad
Hi, I am using radosgw to connect to my ceph cluster, I am testing it and with large number of requests, I get: *** buffer overflow detected ***: /bin/radosgw terminated in the syslog. I use CentOS 7, and this is the some of the last lines of the log: ceph version 0.80.5

Re: Pull requests : speed up the reviews

2014-11-10 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote: Hi Greg, On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Gregory Farnum wrote: I suppose one way of handling this might be to ask everybody to dedicate a small amount of time to reviews (as you suggest), but to emphasize PR management as much as

Re: radosgw buffer overflow

2014-11-10 Thread Yehuda Sadeh
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Mustafa Muhammad mustafaa.alhamda...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am using radosgw to connect to my ceph cluster, I am testing it and with large number of requests, I get: *** buffer overflow detected ***: /bin/radosgw terminated in the syslog. I use CentOS 7, and