We had a similar idea on our mind for a while now. The thought was to
add a key value support that leverages omaps and get it exposed
through the RESTful rados gateway. Having a real world use for it will
certainly help in understanding the requirements.
Yehuda
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:44 PM,
Well I've used Btrfs on and off for two years now I think - in less
critical situations though (at home, on testing equipment at work and
on easily rebuildable systems). I've been bitten several times before
so I know there've been serious problems with it.
With Kernel 3.5 I had a pretty good
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 01:26:03 +0200
John Axel Eriksson j...@insane.se wrote:
another distributed
storage solution that had failed us more than once and we lost data.
Since the old system had an http interface (not S3 compatible though)
can you say a bit more about this? failure stories are
Am 18.09.2012 04:32, schrieb Sage Weil:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Tren Blackburn wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian
Wiessner f.wiess...@smart-weblications.de wrote:
Hi,
i use ceph to provide storage via rbd for our virtualization cluster
delivering
KVM
Am Dienstag, 11. September 2012, 17:25:49 schrieben Sie:
The next stable release will have cephx authentication enabled by default.
Hm, that could be a problem for me. I have tried multiple times to get cephx
working in the past, without lasting success. (I cannot recall at the moment
what the
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Guido Winkelmann
guido-c...@thisisnotatest.de wrote:
Am Dienstag, 11. September 2012, 17:25:49 schrieben Sie:
The next stable release will have cephx authentication enabled by default.
Hm, that could be a problem for me. I have tried multiple times to get cephx
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Andrey Korolyov and...@xdel.ru wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Guido Winkelmann
guido-c...@thisisnotatest.de wrote:
Am Dienstag, 11. September 2012, 17:25:49 schrieben Sie:
The next stable release will have cephx authentication enabled by default.
Hm,
I actually opted to not specifically mention the product we had
problems with since there have been lots of changes and fixes to it,
which we unfortunately were unable to make use of(you'll know why
later). But I guess it's interesting enough to go into a little more
detail so... before moving to
thanks a lot for the detailed writeup, I found it quite useful.
the list of contestants is similar to the list I made when researching (and I
also had luwak);
while I also think ceph is very promising and probably deserves to dominate in
the future,
I'm focusing on openstack swift for now. FWIW
Agreed, this was a really interesting writeup! Thanks John!
Dieter, do you mind if I ask what is compelling for you in choosing
swift vs the other options you've looked at including Ceph?
Thanks,
Mark
On 09/18/2012 09:51 AM, Plaetinck, Dieter wrote:
thanks a lot for the detailed writeup, I
On 18-09-12 15:54, Andrey Korolyov wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Andrey Korolyov and...@xdel.ru wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Guido Winkelmann
guido-c...@thisisnotatest.de wrote:
Am Dienstag, 11. September 2012, 17:25:49 schrieben Sie:
The next stable release will have
I don't mind.
Ultimately it came down to ceph vs swift for us.
Nothing is cast in stone yet, but we choose swift for our new
not-yet-production cluster, because
swift has has been around longer and has more production deployments, and hence
a bigger/more experienced community, better
Hi Dieter,
It sounds like some of those things will come with time (more
experienced community, docs, deployments, papers, etc). Are there other
things we could be doing that would make Ceph feel less risky for people
doing similar comparisons?
Thanks,
Mark
On 09/18/2012 10:19 AM,
Right, it just takes time to grow these things.
Maybe the process could be accelerated by being more out there, but what do I
know about marketing.. not much :)
Dieter
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:27:52 -0500
Mark Nelson mark.nel...@inktank.com wrote:
Hi Dieter,
It sounds like some of those
I am using Ceph mainly for it's KVM and OpenStack integration, and
also RBD. I also needed to provide shared storage to clusters of
nodes, and thus far I haven't needed the highest-possible performance.
Thus, I create RBDs, format them with ext4, and re-export them with
NFS. Clients do both NFS
Hi Matt,
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Matt W. Benjamin wrote:
Hi
Just FYI, on the NFS integration front. A pnfs files (RFC5661)-capable
NFSv4 re-exporter for Ceph has been committed to the Ganesha NFSv4
server development branch. We're continuing to enhance and elaborate
this. We have had on
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
Am 18.09.2012 04:32, schrieb Sage Weil:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Tren Blackburn wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian
Wiessner f.wiess...@smart-weblications.de wrote:
Hi,
i use
Hi Sage,
- Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
Hi Matt,
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Matt W. Benjamin wrote:
Hi
Just FYI, on the NFS integration front. A pnfs files
(RFC5661)-capable
NFSv4 re-exporter for Ceph has been committed to the Ganesha NFSv4
server development branch. We're
Excellent write-up. We are exactly in the same mess with
Riak Luwak, a decision that was made before I took over the
project. I thought we were the only one :)
We are still paying the price for it, as after over
a month of migrating the data from Riak to Ceph, we barely
moved 30% of the data.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Tren Blackburn wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian
Wiessner f.wiess...@smart-weblications.de wrote:
Hi,
i use ceph to provide storage via rbd for our
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Tren Blackburn wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Tren Blackburn wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian
Wiessner f.wiess...@smart-weblications.de wrote:
Hi,
i use
Hey Xiaopong (is that your first or last name by the way? - sorry for
my ignorance),
I feel your pain believe me :-). We've had many sleepless nights
salvaging data. We've actually completely
migrated off Riak/Luwak by now and are pretty happy about it. As you
say - we've watched the cluster go
Hi List;
I've been working with ceph 0.51 lately, and have noticed this for a
while now, but it hasn't been a big enough issue for me to report.
However today I'm turning up a 192 OSD cluster, and 30 seconds per OSD
adds up pretty quick. For some reason it's taking 30 seconds between
checking the
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Tren Blackburn wrote:
Hi List;
I've been working with ceph 0.51 lately, and have noticed this for a
while now, but it hasn't been a big enough issue for me to report.
However today I'm turning up a 192 OSD cluster, and 30 seconds per OSD
adds up pretty quick. For some
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Tren Blackburn wrote:
Hi List;
I've been working with ceph 0.51 lately, and have noticed this for a
while now, but it hasn't been a big enough issue for me to report.
However today I'm turning up a 192
On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Sage Weil wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Skowron S?awomir wrote:
Dnia 5 wrz 2012 o godz. 17:53 Sage Weil s...@inktank.com napisa?(a):
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, S?awomir Skowron wrote:
Ok, but in global case, when i use, a chef/puppet or any other, i wish
to change
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Tren Blackburn t...@eotnetworks.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Tren Blackburn wrote:
Hi List;
I've been working with ceph 0.51 lately, and have noticed this for a
while now, but it hasn't
On 09/18/2012 02:23 PM, Tren Blackburn wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Tren Blackburn t...@eotnetworks.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Tren Blackburn wrote:
Hi List;
I've been working with ceph 0.51 lately, and have
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Josh Durgin josh.dur...@inktank.com wrote:
On 09/18/2012 02:23 PM, Tren Blackburn wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Tren Blackburn t...@eotnetworks.com
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Tren
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
Hey,
A common requirement that's come up in conversation a few times now is
on-disk, at-rest encryption. Usually, this is really just about making
sure the bits on an individual disk are useless in isolation, so that
drives
Ok, thanks, i try this on INT, but on production, i will stay with stable
release, and wait for merge in next stable.
Regards
Slawomir Skowron
Dnia 18 wrz 2012 o godz. 23:18 Sage Weil s...@inktank.com napisał(a):
On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Sage Weil wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Skowron
31 matches
Mail list logo
