Hi Guang,
Does 'copy' works for your case? copying one objects inside one bucket would
copy the head object only. The shadow objects are not copied.
If rgw_max_chunk_objects is configured to be small(say 1-byte) then we have a
'symbolic link' like file.
thanks, -yuan
-Original
Hi Yehuda,
I was trying to do some tests on nginx over rgw and ran into some issue on the
PUT side:
$ swift upload con ceph_fuse.cc
Object PUT failed: http://localhost/swift/v1/con/ceph_fuse.cc 411 Length
Required MissingContentLength
However the GET/HEAD/POST requests are all working. From
content length compat = true
Thanks, -yuan
-Original Message-
From: Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub [mailto:yeh...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 11:29 PM
To: Zhou, Yuan
Cc: Ceph Development
Subject: Re: nginx for rgw fcgi frontend
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Zhou, Yuan <yua
Hi Loic/Li,
We have a local Ceph binary repo for our local teuthology testing. I'm using
some modified Ceph gitbuilder (https://github.com/ceph/gitbuilder) to create
the repo. The things I've changed are:
1. modify branch-local to watch our branchs only, otherwise there'll be too
many
I'm also using make-debs.sh to generate the binaries for some local deployment.
Note that if you need the *tests.deb you'll need to change this scripts a bit.
@@ -58,8 +58,8 @@ tar -C $releasedir -zxf $releasedir/ceph_$vers.orig.tar.gz
#
cp -a debian $releasedir/ceph-$vers/debian
cd
; Zhou, Yuan
Cc: David Casier AEVOO; Ceph Devel; se...@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: local teuthology testing
Hi,
Since July 18th teuthology no longer uses chef, this issue has been resolved !
Using ansible requires configuration ( http://dachary.org/?p=3752 explains it
shortly, maybe
Hi David/Loic,
I was also trying to make some local Teuthology clusters here. The biggest
issue I met is in the ceph-qa-chef - there're lots of hardcoded URL related
with the sepia lab. I have to trace the code and change them line by line.
Can you please kindly share me how did you get this
Hi Yehuda,
I see there's a wiki page on RGW object versioning. And from the code looks
like it's already there.
https://wiki.ceph.com/Development/RGW_Object_Versioning
But the RGW doc tells me Swift/S3 object version is not supported.
http://ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/swift/
Hi Yehuda,
I trace the code and the read op seems happen at RGWRados::raw_obj_stat()? This
looks like some unnecessary if the range does not fall on to the head object.
I tried to set the rgw_max_chunk_size = 0 and it's not working on the PUT side.
Do you have any ideas on how to avoid this
Hey Patrick,
Looks like the GMT+8 time for the 1st day is wrong, should be 10:00 pm - 7:30
am?
-Original Message-
From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Patrick McGarry
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 11:28 PM
To: Ceph Devel;
Hi Zack,
I was testing on some home-made Teuthology cluster. Till now I can use the
teuthology-suite to submit the test cases and start some workers to do the
tests. From the Pulpito logs I can see most of the tests are passed except
there was some error when aggregating the results in the
FWIW, there was some discussion in OpenStack Swift and their performance tests
showed 255 is not the best in recent XFS. They decided to use large xattr
boundary size(65535).
https://gist.github.com/smerritt/5e7e650abaa20599ff34
-Original Message-
From:
Hi Somnath,
The background was a bit complicated. This was part of the MOC project, which
aims to setup an open-exchange cloud between several private cloud inside
several universities.
[mailto:james@ssi.samsung.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2015 1:40 AM
To: Zhou, Yuan; Ceph Development
Cc: Cohen, David E; Yu, Zhidong
Subject: RE: libcrush.so
Hi Yuan,
Very interesting. Would be possible to know why application needs to access
the cursh map directly instead of accessing through
Ceph use crush algorithm to provide the mapping of objects to OSD servers. This
is great for clients so they could talk to with these OSDs directly. However
there are some scenarios where the application needs to access the crush map,
for load-balancing as an example.
Currently Ceph doesn't
-Original Message-
From: Loic Dachary [mailto:l...@dachary.org]
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 5:19 PM
To: Zhou, Yuan
Cc: Ceph Development; Zack Cerza
Subject: Re: Ceph code tests / teuthology
Hi,
On 13/04/2015 04:39, Zhou, Yuan wrote: Hi Loic,
I'm trying to setup an internal Teuthology
. Thanks for the setup doc, I'm going to have another try.
Thanks, -yuan
-Original Message-
From: Zack Cerza [mailto:z...@redhat.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2015 12:11 AM
To: Sage Weil
Cc: Zhou, Yuan; Loic Dachary; Ceph Development
Subject: Re: Ceph code tests / teuthology
If you're
Hi Loic,
I'm trying to setup an internal Teuthology cluster here. I was able to setup a
3 node cluster now. however there's not much docs and I'm confused about some
questions here:
1) how does Ceph upstream do tests? Currently I see there's a) Jekins(make
check on each PR) b) Teuthology
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Abhishek Dixit dixita...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
yeh...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Abhishek Dixit dixita...@gmail.com
To: ceph-devel ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Wednesday,
Hi Mark, do you have the recording videos for this meeting?
Regards, -yuan
-Original Message-
From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Mark Nelson
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 10:49 AM
To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject:
20 matches
Mail list logo
