Re: What should be in the next hammer/firefly release ?
Hi Robert, http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10399 was backported to hammer and will be in v0.94.4 (see http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12751 for details). Cheers On 18/09/2015 02:44, Robert LeBlanc wrote: > Can we get http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10399 into hammer. We hit this > today. > > Robert LeBlanc > PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1 > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote: >> Hi Loic, > >> As the last pull request #5257 was committed into the main trunk, >> we believe all the SHEC codes in main trunk are ready to be backported into >> Hammer branch. >> What can we do at this moment? > >> Best regards, >> Takeshi Miyamae > >> -Original Message- >> From: Miyamae, Takeshi/宮前 剛 >> Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2015 4:09 PM >> To: 'ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org' >> Cc: Paul Von-Stamwitz (pvonstamw...@us.fujitsu.com); Toshine, Naoyoshi/利根 >> 直佳; Shiozawa, Kensuke/塩沢 賢輔; Nakao, Takanori/中尾 鷹詔 >> (nakao.takan...@jp.fujitsu.com) >> Subject: Re: What should be in the next hammer/firefly release ? > >> Dear Loic, > >> We would like to let following two patches be backported to hammer v0.94.4. >> (And our wish is finally backporting these patches to RHCS v1.3.) Can it be >> possible? If possible, please let us know what should be started at first. >> (Caution: #5257 has not been committed to master branch yet.) > >> erasure-code: shec plugin feature #5493 >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5493 > >> erasure code: shec performance optimization by decoding cache #5257 >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5257 > >> Best regards, >> Takeshi Miyamae > >> -Original Message- >> From: Loic Dachary dachary.org> >> Subject: What should be in the next hammer/firefly release ? >> Newsgroups: gmane.comp.file-systems.ceph.devel >> Date: 2015-09-02 11:00:53 GMT (15 hours and 32 minutes ago) Hi, > >> I added a link to > >> http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases/wiki/HOWTO#Overview-of-the-backports-in-progress > >> to show all issues that should be in the next point release for > >> hammer v0.94.4 : http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/495 >> firefly v0.80.11 : http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/480 > >> Cheers > >> -- >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: What should be in the next hammer/firefly release ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Thanks, didn't find the original ticket number in the list. - Robert LeBlanc PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1 On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi Robert, > > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10399 was backported to hammer and will be in > v0.94.4 (see http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12751 for details). > > Cheers > > On 18/09/2015 02:44, Robert LeBlanc wrote: >> Can we get http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10399 into hammer. We hit this >> today. >> >> Robert LeBlanc >> PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1 >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote: >>> Hi Loic, >> >>> As the last pull request #5257 was committed into the main trunk, >>> we believe all the SHEC codes in main trunk are ready to be backported into >>> Hammer branch. >>> What can we do at this moment? >> >>> Best regards, >>> Takeshi Miyamae >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Miyamae, Takeshi/宮前 剛 >>> Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2015 4:09 PM >>> To: 'ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org' >>> Cc: Paul Von-Stamwitz (pvonstamw...@us.fujitsu.com); Toshine, Naoyoshi/利根 >>> 直佳; Shiozawa, Kensuke/塩沢 賢輔; Nakao, Takanori/中尾 鷹詔 >>> (nakao.takan...@jp.fujitsu.com) >>> Subject: Re: What should be in the next hammer/firefly release ? >> >>> Dear Loic, >> >>> We would like to let following two patches be backported to hammer v0.94.4. >>> (And our wish is finally backporting these patches to RHCS v1.3.) Can it be >>> possible? If possible, please let us know what should be started at first. >>> (Caution: #5257 has not been committed to master branch yet.) >> >>> erasure-code: shec plugin feature #5493 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5493 >> >>> erasure code: shec performance optimization by decoding cache #5257 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5257 >> >>> Best regards, >>> Takeshi Miyamae >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Loic Dachary dachary.org> >>> Subject: What should be in the next hammer/firefly release ? >>> Newsgroups: gmane.comp.file-systems.ceph.devel >>> Date: 2015-09-02 11:00:53 GMT (15 hours and 32 minutes ago) Hi, >> >>> I added a link to >> >>> http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases/wiki/HOWTO#Overview-of-the-backports-in-progress >> >>> to show all issues that should be in the next point release for >> >>> hammer v0.94.4 : http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/495 >>> firefly v0.80.11 : http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/480 >> >>> Cheers >> >>> -- >>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Mailvelope v1.1.0 Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJV/DdkCRDmVDuy+mK58QAAB9wP/ilDxlotJ3ar6l46AjhB hM9aytpLermhzOvznNkwrRXcRET7IZcBUeNv9lr2E1Elq56mM7d4nlvpJMME KdfmvkfQYR1oiyKt0lJgG3Hl6ZCtzNRzWSEGp72yCpKmtK0/47PWQvQHdW8C B88umZ1i1u16VuKEv8TdgySohJCXr/7gTMYrui7yQCBWoUWUaSSH+MV7UStx vWM0806Xvvp3hfbrh5ffBk1ycLDaYDvW0+/vQJc0VJpGLn47u8TVjZrj1xZk 92B2TXwHdIMAQpF7xGFwVDbY+PkExRPWd8Yd75kxL7O+s+HYQIPU2nDo9qp8 PgXsXKr8Qu/WksbjVi8GEUj8rLrOPgoboqB+D6e4RpaZz4/gHt12aedQwbPj hm6N4KOVr3oc5+QEAu81loC3d/uG4+BDwVTRRn4bt8+5ksOLDWeKdYOteBim BvlyUt42ZlbDKQlr65a/h/v2C8asSvMM1NNhFl/NOM9k01wCY7/dNsWMeO0T 88gn4rAMNA9fpP1kZvFc5h7palKhPh2CVr9VuKyc45YBi8w8pCD2eYwgBjPN R7LDbOgUhBjRtU/bqLY/KQYzG7o5VMuJp0MtY9HHDLXQyqR6GyMMUuKYFCX9 xREqJQStrTi1eQ7oeZ0gLcx9sd7WmWldb8OW6JTgJ7zu5rB8N3qu+V2JN2nn OAW5 =M8sA -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: Re: What should be in the next hammer/firefly release ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Can we get http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10399 into hammer. We hit this today. - Robert LeBlanc PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1 On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote: > Hi Loic, > > As the last pull request #5257 was committed into the main trunk, > we believe all the SHEC codes in main trunk are ready to be backported into > Hammer branch. > What can we do at this moment? > > Best regards, > Takeshi Miyamae > > -Original Message- > From: Miyamae, Takeshi/宮前 剛 > Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2015 4:09 PM > To: 'ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org' > Cc: Paul Von-Stamwitz (pvonstamw...@us.fujitsu.com); Toshine, Naoyoshi/利根 直佳; > Shiozawa, Kensuke/塩沢 賢輔; Nakao, Takanori/中尾 鷹詔 (nakao.takan...@jp.fujitsu.com) > Subject: Re: What should be in the next hammer/firefly release ? > > Dear Loic, > > We would like to let following two patches be backported to hammer v0.94.4. > (And our wish is finally backporting these patches to RHCS v1.3.) Can it be > possible? If possible, please let us know what should be started at first. > (Caution: #5257 has not been committed to master branch yet.) > > erasure-code: shec plugin feature #5493 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5493 > > erasure code: shec performance optimization by decoding cache #5257 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5257 > > Best regards, > Takeshi Miyamae > > -----Original Message- > From: Loic Dachary dachary.org> > Subject: What should be in the next hammer/firefly release ? > Newsgroups: gmane.comp.file-systems.ceph.devel > Date: 2015-09-02 11:00:53 GMT (15 hours and 32 minutes ago) Hi, > > I added a link to > > http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases/wiki/HOWTO#Overview-of-the-backports-in-progress > > to show all issues that should be in the next point release for > > hammer v0.94.4 : http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/495 > firefly v0.80.11 : http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/480 > > Cheers > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Mailvelope v1.0.2 Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJV+16ECRDmVDuy+mK58QAANCsP/jmNpzoF+k24vrsgYa54 Yy4dD9WO1uK/eT11ZqQGt/eN+ISiia8ztI2zoXkUsMZNOT4sBpzyHdvJTgRP 27wFVppWy7Lrk9rwfk650WyJJDxyb8O6nERVPtd3aOs1uHVuTo3tzdJcrIhM 85rSkSGU23NnGFj9D0OluNVx/ZsmuqHNjJz5tb4YO5rHmB9CZ92tVqrCNxaj cfEmVE+h2CGQyGHyGgFgDGSCRgZiKScGLJfq2FG5WCyVaXShwbVj0ffkKDEP xC87wECZatlSpNkMrFRLAVe91rth7RRexLS3aFQh6YGAhCkblxcI0HxbXRwg hMUiL9AN5NxvhWMYJv6gU9BALDAsmRBS/m3F/ENToWTw6xWTPnA6xbAh+JKs DCT7iTgwww0TLMAjUrDBTarW1ZyXEsFoWmHTaPGdwSKWo69mfFCOshOnThv7 0IRUCmk4Can4WIMRUj/gUoY2qjBF6V/f9LsKns15EdlJrfYyjtdBxqaDH2vP YFLwdj4ff5K/Ya9Ex7Wx38wwspd5i1XPkJMg7jsNTFN179nhOgbTrTp1FzTN JKTrrCtbxJ328SzhCLWhoPrMNUmFMj10ifX7U2Hi05ihln3BmgGLIKaJdhRy ZhtA+jahhCuUrT9tcs/pbUiYkKokfz2efBpB17oVBTROEYELEYxZkYXtRsLN 0R1+ =fXlI -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
RE: What should be in the next hammer/firefly release ?
Hi Loic,
It's not strange that you worry about that since we have committed lots of pull
requests
into the main trunk so far.
However, we are considering each pull request already committed was either a
bug fix or
a performance improvement, so we believe we are qualified to backport them into
hammer.
Anyway, we tried to backport it on our local repository in order to decide
whether it's feasible
or not and felt that it's not so difficult although we had to resolve a little
complicated conflicts.
In addition, we could have selected only local commits in shec directory and
avoided
changing any erasure code I/F.
Here is the result of our backport trial.
https://github.com/t-miyamae/ceph/commits/hammer
We are very glad if you could check it out and let us know your opinion after
that.
We are testing it on our cluster for a couple of days in parallel.
Best regards,
Takeshi Miyamae
-Original Message-
From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Loic Dachary
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 8:12 PM
To: Miyamae, Takeshi/宮前 剛; Ceph Development
Cc: Von-Stamwitz, Paul; Toshine, Naoyoshi/利根 直佳; Shiozawa, Kensuke/塩沢 賢輔;
Nakao, Takanori/中尾 鷹詔
Subject: Re: What should be in the next hammer/firefly release ?
Hi,
Since SHEC really is a new feature in Infernalis (because it was experimental
before), I'll leave it to Sam and Sage to decide if it's relevant to backport
to Hammer. Note that it depends on changes in the erasure code base that extend
to all plugins. Backporting would unfortunately not be as simple as
cherry-picking the commits modifying the shec directories.
Cheers
On 10/09/2015 12:57, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote:
> Hi Loic,
>
> As the last pull request #5257 was committed into the main trunk, we
> believe all the SHEC codes in main trunk are ready to be backported into
> Hammer branch.
> What can we do at this moment?
>
> Best regards,
> Takeshi Miyamae
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Miyamae, Takeshi/宮前 剛
> Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2015 4:09 PM
> To: 'ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org'
> Cc: Paul Von-Stamwitz (pvonstamw...@us.fujitsu.com); Toshine,
> Naoyoshi/利根 直佳; Shiozawa, Kensuke/塩沢 賢輔; Nakao, Takanori/中尾 鷹詔
> (nakao.takan...@jp.fujitsu.com)
> Subject: Re: What should be in the next hammer/firefly release ?
>
> Dear Loic,
>
> We would like to let following two patches be backported to hammer v0.94.4.
> (And our wish is finally backporting these patches to RHCS v1.3.) Can it be
> possible? If possible, please let us know what should be started at first.
> (Caution: #5257 has not been committed to master branch yet.)
>
> erasure-code: shec plugin feature #5493
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5493
>
> erasure code: shec performance optimization by decoding cache #5257
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5257
>
> Best regards,
> Takeshi Miyamae
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Loic Dachary dachary.org>
> Subject: What should be in the next hammer/firefly release ?
> Newsgroups: gmane.comp.file-systems.ceph.devel
> Date: 2015-09-02 11:00:53 GMT (15 hours and 32 minutes ago) Hi,
>
> I added a link to
>
> http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases/wiki/HOWTO#Overview-of-
> the-backports-in-progress
>
> to show all issues that should be in the next point release for
>
> hammer v0.94.4 : http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/495
> firefly v0.80.11 : http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/480
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> N r y b X ǧv ^ ){.n + z ]z {ay ʇڙ ,j f h z w
j:+v w j m zZ+ ݢj" !tml=
>
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
RE: Re: What should be in the next hammer/firefly release ?
Hi Loic, As the last pull request #5257 was committed into the main trunk, we believe all the SHEC codes in main trunk are ready to be backported into Hammer branch. What can we do at this moment? Best regards, Takeshi Miyamae -Original Message- From: Miyamae, Takeshi/宮前 剛 Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2015 4:09 PM To: 'ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org' Cc: Paul Von-Stamwitz (pvonstamw...@us.fujitsu.com); Toshine, Naoyoshi/利根 直佳; Shiozawa, Kensuke/塩沢 賢輔; Nakao, Takanori/中尾 鷹詔 (nakao.takan...@jp.fujitsu.com) Subject: Re: What should be in the next hammer/firefly release ? Dear Loic, We would like to let following two patches be backported to hammer v0.94.4. (And our wish is finally backporting these patches to RHCS v1.3.) Can it be possible? If possible, please let us know what should be started at first. (Caution: #5257 has not been committed to master branch yet.) erasure-code: shec plugin feature #5493 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5493 erasure code: shec performance optimization by decoding cache #5257 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5257 Best regards, Takeshi Miyamae -Original Message- From: Loic Dachary dachary.org> Subject: What should be in the next hammer/firefly release ? Newsgroups: gmane.comp.file-systems.ceph.devel Date: 2015-09-02 11:00:53 GMT (15 hours and 32 minutes ago) Hi, I added a link to http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases/wiki/HOWTO#Overview-of-the-backports-in-progress to show all issues that should be in the next point release for hammer v0.94.4 : http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/495 firefly v0.80.11 : http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/480 Cheers -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
Re: What should be in the next hammer/firefly release ?
Hi,
Since SHEC really is a new feature in Infernalis (because it was experimental
before), I'll leave it to Sam and Sage to decide if it's relevant to backport
to Hammer. Note that it depends on changes in the erasure code base that extend
to all plugins. Backporting would unfortunately not be as simple as
cherry-picking the commits modifying the shec directories.
Cheers
On 10/09/2015 12:57, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote:
> Hi Loic,
>
> As the last pull request #5257 was committed into the main trunk,
> we believe all the SHEC codes in main trunk are ready to be backported into
> Hammer branch.
> What can we do at this moment?
>
> Best regards,
> Takeshi Miyamae
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Miyamae, Takeshi/宮前 剛
> Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2015 4:09 PM
> To: 'ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org'
> Cc: Paul Von-Stamwitz (pvonstamw...@us.fujitsu.com); Toshine, Naoyoshi/利根 直佳;
> Shiozawa, Kensuke/塩沢 賢輔; Nakao, Takanori/中尾 鷹詔 (nakao.takan...@jp.fujitsu.com)
> Subject: Re: What should be in the next hammer/firefly release ?
>
> Dear Loic,
>
> We would like to let following two patches be backported to hammer v0.94.4.
> (And our wish is finally backporting these patches to RHCS v1.3.) Can it be
> possible? If possible, please let us know what should be started at first.
> (Caution: #5257 has not been committed to master branch yet.)
>
> erasure-code: shec plugin feature #5493
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5493
>
> erasure code: shec performance optimization by decoding cache #5257
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5257
>
> Best regards,
> Takeshi Miyamae
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Loic Dachary dachary.org>
> Subject: What should be in the next hammer/firefly release ?
> Newsgroups: gmane.comp.file-systems.ceph.devel
> Date: 2015-09-02 11:00:53 GMT (15 hours and 32 minutes ago) Hi,
>
> I added a link to
>
> http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases/wiki/HOWTO#Overview-of-the-backports-in-progress
>
> to show all issues that should be in the next point release for
>
> hammer v0.94.4 : http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/495
> firefly v0.80.11 : http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/480
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> N�r��y���b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+���z�]z���{ay� ʇڙ�,j��f���h���z� �w���
> ���j:+v���w�j�mzZ+�ݢj"��!tml=
>
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
What should be in the next hammer/firefly release ?
Hi, I added a link to http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases/wiki/HOWTO#Overview-of-the-backports-in-progress to show all issues that should be in the next point release for hammer v0.94.4 : http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/495 firefly v0.80.11 : http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/480 Cheers -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
