full cluster/pool handling

2015-09-24 Thread Sage Weil
Xuan Liu recently pointed out that there is a problem with our handling for full clusters/pools: we don't allow any writes when full, including delete operations. While fixing a separate full issue I ended up making several fixes and cleanups in the full handling code in

Re: full cluster/pool handling

2015-09-24 Thread Sage Weil
On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 5:30 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > > Xuan Liu recently pointed out that there is a problem with our handling > > for full clusters/pools: we don't allow any writes when full, > > including delete operations. >

Re: full cluster/pool handling

2015-09-24 Thread Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 5:30 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > Xuan Liu recently pointed out that there is a problem with our handling > for full clusters/pools: we don't allow any writes when full, > including delete operations. > > While fixing a separate full issue I ended up making

Re: full cluster/pool handling

2015-09-24 Thread Robert LeBlanc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > Xuan Liu recently pointed out that there is a problem with our handling > for full clusters/pools: we don't allow any writes when full, > including delete operations. > > While fixing a separate

Re: full cluster/pool handling

2015-09-24 Thread Sage Weil
On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, Robert LeBlanc wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > > Xuan Liu recently pointed out that there is a problem with our handling > > for full clusters/pools: we don't allow any writes when full, >

Re: full cluster/pool handling

2015-09-24 Thread Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 5:30 AM, Sage Weil wrote: >> > Xuan Liu recently pointed out that there is a problem with our handling >> > for full

Re: full cluster/pool handling

2015-09-24 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, Robert LeBlanc wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Sage Weil wrote: >> > Xuan Liu recently pointed out that there is a problem with our

Re: full cluster/pool handling

2015-09-24 Thread John Spray
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Sage Weil wrote: >> On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, Robert LeBlanc wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA256 >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Sage

Re: full cluster/pool handling

2015-09-24 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 1:36 PM, John Spray wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote: >> That latter switch already exists, by the way, although I don't think >> it's actually enforced via cephx caps (it should be) — the Objecter >>