Xuan Liu recently pointed out that there is a problem with our handling
for full clusters/pools: we don't allow any writes when full,
including delete operations.
While fixing a separate full issue I ended up making several fixes and
cleanups in the full handling code in
On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 5:30 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> > Xuan Liu recently pointed out that there is a problem with our handling
> > for full clusters/pools: we don't allow any writes when full,
> > including delete operations.
>
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 5:30 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> Xuan Liu recently pointed out that there is a problem with our handling
> for full clusters/pools: we don't allow any writes when full,
> including delete operations.
>
> While fixing a separate full issue I ended up making
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> Xuan Liu recently pointed out that there is a problem with our handling
> for full clusters/pools: we don't allow any writes when full,
> including delete operations.
>
> While fixing a separate
On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> > Xuan Liu recently pointed out that there is a problem with our handling
> > for full clusters/pools: we don't allow any writes when full,
>
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 5:30 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
>> > Xuan Liu recently pointed out that there is a problem with our handling
>> > for full
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
>> > Xuan Liu recently pointed out that there is a problem with our
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA256
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Sage
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 1:36 PM, John Spray wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
>> That latter switch already exists, by the way, although I don't think
>> it's actually enforced via cephx caps (it should be) — the Objecter
>>