Re: [PATCH 1/1 linux-next] ceph: use standard Opt_err

2015-06-15 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Fabian Frederick wrote: > > >> On 08 June 2015 at 09:49 Ilya Dryomov wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Fabian Frederick wrote: >> > ceph used -1 for the last match_table_t option. >> > Use Opt_err enum like other FS >> > >> > match_token() is base

ec pool history objects

2015-06-15 Thread 池信泽
hi, all: when I use ec poll, I see there are some object history for object xx. Such as: xx__head_610951D6__2_fe1_2, xx__head_610951D6__2_fe2_2 xx__head_610951D6__2__2 I think this object is used for roll_back when not all shards have written object to

Re: Please help triage these old backports

2015-06-15 Thread Loic Dachary
[adding ceph-devel for other backporters benefit] Hi Nathan, On 15/06/2015 11:34, Nathan Cutler wrote: > Hi Loic: > > I went over the list of old untriaged backports at > > http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&set_filter=1&f[]=status_id&op[status_id]=%3D&v[status_id][]=14

[PATCH RFC] storage:rbd: make the size of request is equal to the, size of the object

2015-06-15 Thread juncheng bai
From 6213215bd19926d1063d4e01a248107dab8a899b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: juncheng bai Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:34:00 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] storage:rbd: make the size of request is equal to the size of the object ensures that the merged size of request can achieve the size of the object. w

Re: rbd top

2015-06-15 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Robert LeBlanc wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > One feature we would like is an "rbd top" command that would be like > top, but show usage of RBD volumes so that we can quickly identify > high demand RBDs. > > Since I haven't done any

Multi-object transaction support update

2015-06-15 Thread Li Wang
Hi Sage and Samuel, We have updated the status of our design and implementation of multi-object transaction support at http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/wiki/Rados_-_multi-object_transaction_support, your comments are appreciated. Cheers, Li Wang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send th

Re: [PATCH RFC] storage:rbd: make the size of request is equal to the, size of the object

2015-06-15 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:18 PM, juncheng bai wrote: > From 6213215bd19926d1063d4e01a248107dab8a899b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: juncheng bai > Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:34:00 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] storage:rbd: make the size of request is equal to the > size of the object > > ensures tha

Re: [PATCH RFC] storage:rbd: make the size of request is equal to the, size of the object

2015-06-15 Thread juncheng bai
On 2015/6/15 21:03, Ilya Dryomov wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:18 PM, juncheng bai wrote: From 6213215bd19926d1063d4e01a248107dab8a899b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: juncheng bai Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:34:00 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] storage:rbd: make the size of request is equal to the

Re: rbd top

2015-06-15 Thread Sage Weil
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Gregory Farnum wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Robert LeBlanc wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > One feature we would like is an "rbd top" command that would be like > > top, but show usage of RBD volumes so that we can quickly id

Re: [PATCH RFC] storage:rbd: make the size of request is equal to the, size of the object

2015-06-15 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 4:23 PM, juncheng bai wrote: > > > On 2015/6/15 21:03, Ilya Dryomov wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:18 PM, juncheng bai >> wrote: >>> >>> From 6213215bd19926d1063d4e01a248107dab8a899b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: juncheng bai >>> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:34

ceph branch status

2015-06-15 Thread ceph branch robot
-- All Branches -- Abhishek Lekshmanan 2015-06-13 10:30:09 +0530 hammer-backports Adam Crume 2014-12-01 20:45:58 -0800 wip-doc-rbd-replay Alfredo Deza 2015-03-23 16:39:48 -0400 wip-11212 2015-03-25 10:10:43 -0400 wip-11065 Alfredo Deza 2014-07

Re: rbd top

2015-06-15 Thread John Spray
On 15/06/2015 14:52, Sage Weil wrote: I seem to remember having a short conversation about something like this a few CDS's back... although I think it was 'rados top'. IIRC the basic idea we had was for each OSD to track it's top clients (using some approximate LRU type algorithm) and then ei

Re: rbd top

2015-06-15 Thread Robert LeBlanc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 John, let me see if I understand what you are saying... When a person runs `rbd top`, each OSD would receive a message saying please capture all the performance, grouped by RBD and limit it to 'X'. That way the OSD doesn't have to constantly update

Re: rbd top

2015-06-15 Thread Robert LeBlanc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Gregory Farnum wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Robert LeBlanc wrote: >> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> > Hash: SHA256 >> > >> > One feature we would like

firefly v0.80.10 QE validation status 6/15/2015

2015-06-15 Thread Yuri Weinstein
QE validation is almost completed (there are a couple of jobs that are still running) All statis details were summarized in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090 Highlights (by suite/issue): rados #11914 needs Sam's approval kcephfs n/a needs Greg's approval samba #6613 needs Greg's approval Ni

Re: rbd top

2015-06-15 Thread John Spray
On 15/06/2015 17:10, Robert LeBlanc wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 John, let me see if I understand what you are saying... When a person runs `rbd top`, each OSD would receive a message saying please capture all the performance, grouped by RBD and limit it to 'X'. That

Re: firefly v0.80.10 QE validation status 6/15/2015

2015-06-15 Thread Samuel Just
I do not consider 11914 to be a blocker. -Sam - Original Message - From: "Yuri Weinstein" To: "Ceph Development" Cc: "Loic Dachary" , "Xinxin Shu" Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 9:37:20 AM Subject: firefly v0.80.10 QE validation status 6/15/2015 QE validation is almost completed (there ar

Re: Bucket name restrictions in RGW

2015-06-15 Thread Harshal Gupta
Hi, according to the inputs from the thread, I have included following changes for adding more restrictions to the RGW bucket name : 1. removed previous boolean flag for specifying bucket naming rule and added a int option with values 0,1,2 -OPTION(rgw_relaxed_s3_bucket_names, OPT_BOOL, false) //

Re: Bucket name restrictions in RGW

2015-06-15 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 11:00:23AM +0530, Abhishek L wrote: > > Wido den Hollander writes: > > > On 06/13/2015 01:29 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 07:13:48PM -0400, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote: > >>> Whatever we end up doing, we need to make it configurable, and also

[PATCH] Allow CRLF in config files

2015-06-15 Thread James Devine
Change config fopen to binary mode, allowing LF and CRLF EOL characters so ceph-dokan can work with native windows configuration files going forward. The carriage return is ignored and trimmed as whitespace during parsing via isspace(). Signed-off-by: James Devine --- src/common/ConfUtils.cc | 2

Re: [PATCH RFC] storage:rbd: make the size of request is equal to the, size of the object

2015-06-15 Thread juncheng bai
On 2015/6/15 22:27, Ilya Dryomov wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 4:23 PM, juncheng bai wrote: On 2015/6/15 21:03, Ilya Dryomov wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:18 PM, juncheng bai wrote: From 6213215bd19926d1063d4e01a248107dab8a899b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: juncheng bai Date: M