Re: misc: ignore some unusable block devices
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 04:12:16PM +0100, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi Robin, > > I removed misc: ignore some unusable block devices > 9c5eaeccb807d103884f46d174798dd982092696 from the openstack branch > because it fails on CentOS 7 with > the following. Could you please make a new pull request with it so we > can keep testing it there ? Will do, but I wonder how you managed to get a return code of 2 from it; as that should be device-does-not-exist. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastructure Lead, Foundation Trustee E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: misc: ignore some unusable block devices
On 14/12/2015 19:18, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 04:12:16PM +0100, Loic Dachary wrote: >> Hi Robin, >> >> I removed misc: ignore some unusable block devices >> 9c5eaeccb807d103884f46d174798dd982092696 from the openstack branch >> because it fails on CentOS 7 with >> the following. Could you please make a new pull request with it so we >> can keep testing it there ? > Will do, but I wonder how you managed to get a return code of 2 from it; > as that should be device-does-not-exist. IIRC that happens when blkid fails to retrieve information. I found blkid to be generally faster and less reliable than sgdisk -i 1 /dev/sdd for the purpose of getting partition information. For ceph-disk we chose reliability over speed. That being said I've not investigated the real reason why blkid returns -2. Cheers -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
