Hi,
> On 9 Feb 2022, at 09:03, Benoît Knecht wrote:
>
> I don't remember in which Ceph release it was introduced, but on Pacific
> there's a metric called `ceph_healthcheck_slow_ops`.
At least in Nautilus this metric exists
k
___
ceph-users mailing
Hi all,
We have found that RGW access problems on our clusters almost always
coincide with slow ops in "ceph -s".
Is there any good way to monitor and alert on slow ops from prometheus
metrics?
We are running Nautilus but I'd be interested in any changes that might
help in newer versions, as
Hi folks,
As we near the end of the Quincy cycle, it's time to choose a name for
the next release.
This etherpad began a while ago, so there are some votes already,
however we wanted to open it up for anyone who hasn't voted yet. Add
your +1 to the name you prefer here, or add a new option:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 11:55 AM Stefan Schueffler
wrote:
>
> Hi Casey,
>
> great news to hear about "SSE-S3 almost implemented" :-)
>
> One question about that - will the implementation have one key per bucket, or
> one key per individual object?
>
> Amazon (as per the public available docs) is
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 7:30 AM Dan van der Ster wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 1:04 PM Frank Schilder wrote:
> > The reason for this seemingly strange behaviour was an old static snapshot
> > taken in an entirely different directory. Apparently, ceph fs snapshots are
> > not local to an FS
Totally understand, I'm not really a fan of service-managed encryption keys
as a general rule vs. client-managed. I just thought I'd probe about
capabilities considered stable before embarking on our own work. SSE-S3
would be a reasonable middle-ground. I appreciate the PR link, that's very
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 11:11 AM Casey Bodley wrote:
>
> hi David,
>
> that method of encryption based on rgw_crypt_default_encryption_key
> will never be officially supported.
to expand on why: rgw_crypt_default_encryption_key requires the key
material to be stored insecurely in ceph's config,
hi David,
that method of encryption based on rgw_crypt_default_encryption_key
will never be officially supported. however, support for SSE-S3
encryption [1] is nearly complete in [2] (cc Marcus), and we hope to
include that in the quincy release - and if not, we'll backport it to
quincy in an
Is RGW encryption for all objects at rest still testing only, and if not,
which version is it considered stable in?:
https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/radosgw/encryption/#automatic-encryption-for-testing-only
David
___
ceph-users mailing list --
Hey there again,
there now was a question from Neha Ojha in
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/53663
about providing OSD debug logs for a manual deep-scrub on (inconsistent)
PGs.
I did provide the logs of two of those deep-scrubs via ceph-post-file
already.
But since data inconsistencies are
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 1:04 PM Frank Schilder wrote:
> The reason for this seemingly strange behaviour was an old static snapshot
> taken in an entirely different directory. Apparently, ceph fs snapshots are
> not local to an FS directory sub-tree but always global on the entire FS
> despite
Okay, I definitely need here some help.
The crashing OSD moved with the PG. so The PG seems to have the issue
I moved (via upmaps ) all 4 replicas to filestore OSDs. After this the
error seems to be solved. No OSD crashed after this.
A deep-scrub of the PG didn't throw any error. So I moved the
Hi all,
We have a cephfs cluster in production for about 2 months and, for the past 2-3
weeks, we are regularly experiencing MDS crash loops (every 3-4 hours if we
have some user activity).
A temporary fix is to remove the MDSs in error (or unknown) state, stop samba &
nfs-ganesha
13 matches
Mail list logo
