Hello everybody,
I solved the issue, there was an network misconfiguration and the some
of the osd nodes where not able to communicate with the monitoring node.
Kind regards,
Jelle de Jong
On 12/23/22 17:49, Jelle de Jong wrote:
Hello everybody,
After an reboot of my ceph-osd node non of
Hello everybody,
After an reboot of my ceph-osd node non of the osds came back online.
I am suspecting some issue with the ubuntu focal packages in combination
with ceph 15.2.16-1focal.
I tried upgrading all ceph packages to 15.2.17-1bionic and downgrading
to a few other versions as well
Hi Alex,
We also have a multi-site setup (17.2.5). I just deleted a bunch of
files from one side and some files got deleted on the other side but
not others. I waited 10 hours to see if the files would delete. I
didn't do an exhaustive test like yours, but seems similar issues. In
our case,
If this is the same issue that affected a couple of PRs in the last few
weeks
then rebasing the PR with the latest fetch of the main branch and force
pushing
it should solve the problem.
- Dhairya
On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 7:12 PM Stefan Kooman wrote:
> On 12/19/22 10:26, Stefan Kooman wrote:
>
On 12/19/22 10:26, Stefan Kooman wrote:
On 12/14/22 19:04, Mark Nelson wrote:
This is great work! Would you consider making a PR against main for
the change to ceph-volume? Given that you have performance data it
sounds like good justification. I'm not sure who's merging changes to
The reason for me to stick to older versions as long as possible, is so that
others have solved such problems for me, when I do this upgrade.
I am still in my testing phase of el9/centos9stream. I have for all servers a
custom own repo added. This is where I put packages that are not
On 22.12.2022 15:47, Jonas Schwab wrote:
Now the question: Since I established this setup more or less through
trial and error, I was wondering if there is a more elegant/better
approach than what is outlined above?
You can use namespace so you don't need separate pools.
Unfortunately the
