How much more time do we need to get PR 50549 in if we delayed v17.2.6?
- Ken
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 2:44 PM Laura Flores wrote:
> We are all good on the Core end of things.
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50549 is needed for downstream, but it
> should not block upstream.
>
> On Thu, Mar
I will have a review of the rados suite ready soon.
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 1:44 PM Laura Flores wrote:
> We are all good on the Core end of things.
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50549 is needed for downstream, but it
> should not block upstream.
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 12:59 PM Laura
We are all good on the Core end of things.
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50549 is needed for downstream, but it
should not block upstream.
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 12:59 PM Laura Flores wrote:
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50575 was also merged.
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 12:36 PM
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50575 was also merged.
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 12:36 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote:
> We are still working on core PRs:
>
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50549
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50625 - merged
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50575
>
> Will
Hi Xiubo and Gregory,
sorry for the slow reply, I did some more debugging and didn't have too much
time. First some questions to collecting logs, but please see also below for
reproducing the issue yourselves.
I can reproduce it reliably but need some input for these:
> enabling the kclient
We are still working on core PRs:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50549
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50625 - merged
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50575
Will update as soon as we are ready for the next steps.
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 10:34 AM Casey Bodley wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 22,
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 9:27 AM Casey Bodley wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 4:06 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote:
> >
> > Details of this release are summarized here:
> >
> > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/59070#note-1
> > Release Notes - TBD
> >
> > The reruns were in the queue for 4 days because
Hi all,
Until Ceph Pacific, installing just the "ceph" package was enough to get
everything needed to deploy Ceph.
However, with Quincy, ceph-volume was split off into its own package, and it is
not automatically installed anymore.
Here we can see it is not listed as a dependency:
$ rpm
hi Ernesto and lists,
> [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/47501
are we planning to backport this to quincy so we can support centos 9
there? enabling that upgrade path on centos 9 was one of the
conditions for dropping centos 8 support in reef, which i'm still keen
to do
if not, can we find
Hi,
Thanks again for your input. The value of mon_max_pool_pg_num was at
its default.
It turns out I had missed a few steps in my earlier effort:
After I removed the old default settings for osd_pool_default_pg_num
and osd_pool_default_pgp_num from ceph.conf on *all* nodes, and
restarted all
I made some tests with a virtual environment, mons, mds and OSDs. The OSDs
were 3 VMs with 3 disks each.
Now I'm testing Ceph Quincy on AlmaLinux9 without problems in a test
environment. I'm using VMs for mons (3) and mds(2) but the OSDs (8) are all
physical nodes with 24 HDD.
The installation
11 matches
Mail list logo
