Thanks -
I am on 17.2.5 - I was able to get to it by cephadm shell, a few zap and
deletes of the /dev/sdx and ceph-volume lvm-prepare.
I did miss seeing the db_devices part. For ceph orch apply - that would have
saved a lot of effort. Does the osds_per_device create the partitions on the
upgrades approved!
Thanks,
Neha
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 12:09 PM Radoslaw Zarzynski
wrote:
> rados: approved!
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 7:02 PM Laura Flores wrote:
>
>> Rados review, second round:
>>
>> Failures:
>> 1. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/58560
>> 2. https://tracker.ceph.
Hi
https://ceph.io/en/news/blog/2022/s3select-intro/
Recently I published a blog on s3-select.
the Blog discusses what it is, and why it is required.
the last paragraph discusses the Trino(analytic SQL utility) and its
integration with Ceph/s3select.
that integration is still on-work, and it is
Yes, this is an EC pool, and it was created automatically via the
dashboard.
Will this help to correct my current situation? Currently, there are 3 OSDs
out of 12 that are about 90% full. One of them just crashed and will not
come back up with "bluefs _allocate unable to allocate 0x8 on bdev
Hey Ken,
This change doesn't not involve any further internet access other than the
already required for the "make dist" stage (e.g.: npm packages). That said,
where feasible, I also prefer to keep the current approach for a minor
version.
Kind Regards,
Ernesto
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 9:06 PM K
Hi,
On 28.03.23 05:42, Robert W. Eckert wrote:
I am trying to add a new server to an existing cluster, but cannot get the OSDs
to create correctly
When I try
Cephadm ceph-volume lvm create, it returns nothing but the container info.
You are running a containerized cluster with the cephadm o
Yes it pays off to know what to do before you do it, instead of after. If you
complain about speed, is it a general unfounded complaint or did you compare
ceph with similar solutions? I have really no idea what the standards are for
these types of solutions. I can remember asking at such seminar
On 27.03.23 23:13, Pat Vaughan wrote:
Looking at the pools, there are 2 crush rules. Only one pool has a
meaningful amount of data, the charlotte.rgw.buckets.data pool. This is
the crush rule for that pool.
So that pool uses the device class ssd explicitely where the other pools
do not care
