where feasible, I also prefer to keep the current approach for a minor
> > version.
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Ernesto
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 9:06 PM Ken Dreyer wrote:
> >>
> >> I hope we don't backport such a big change to Quincy.
irst step, we'd need to
> build a full list of the missing packages. the tracker issue only
> complains about python3-asyncssh python3-pecan and python3-routes, but
> some of their dependencies may be missing too
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 3:06 PM Ken Dreyer wrote:
> >
> >
I hope we don't backport such a big change to Quincy. That will have a
large impact on how we build in restricted environments with no
internet access.
We could get the missing packages into EPEL.
- Ken
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 7:32 AM Ernesto Puerta wrote:
>
> Hi Casey,
>
> The original idea
How much more time do we need to get PR 50549 in if we delayed v17.2.6?
- Ken
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 2:44 PM Laura Flores wrote:
> We are all good on the Core end of things.
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50549 is needed for downstream, but it
> should not block upstream.
>
> On Thu, Mar
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 7:52 AM Dominique Ramaekers
wrote:
> Is it possible these pulls aren’t jet included in Quincy Stable?
>
> I can't find a notice in my syslog about the mount syntax I use being
> deprecated.
Those PRs are in Quincy. However, there are no syslog warnings about
deprecating
On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 11:24 PM Sagittarius-A Black Hole
wrote:
>
> No, I actually included the ceph fstype, just not in my example (the
> initial post), but the key is really mds_namespace for specifying the
> filesystem, this should be included in the documentation.
We removed mds_namespace
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 11:35 AM Konstantin Shalygin wrote:
>
> Hi Ken,
>
> CentOS 8 Stream will continue to receive packages or have some barrires for R?
No, starting with Reef, we will no longer build nor ship RPMs for
CentOS 8 Stream (and debs for Ubuntu Focal) from download.ceph.com.
The
Hi folks,
In the Ceph Leadership Team meeting today we discussed dropping
support for older distros in our Reef release. CentOS 9 and Ubuntu
Jammy (22.04) have been out for a while. With recent changes in Ceph's
main branch, it will make it easier to minimally require CentOS 9 and
Ubuntu Jammy
I think it's a great idea to remove it.
- Ken
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:52 PM Adam C. Emerson wrote:
>
> Good day,
>
> Some time ago, the LevelDB maintainers turned -fno-rtti on in their
> build. As we don't use -fno-rtti, building LevelDBStore
> against newer LevelDB packages can fail.
>
>
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:11 AM Eugen Block wrote:
> I
> found a bug report [1] stating that the option '--ceph-version' will
> be removed.
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917552
Note that bugzilla ticket is about the downstream RH Ceph Storage
product, where we have a very
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 12:03 PM Ken Dreyer wrote:
> There are a few more small cleanups I need to land in order to
> reconcile the epel8 and master branches.
The maintainers merged the cleanups. Here's the next PR to sync the
remaining epel8 diff into master:
https://src.fedoraproject.or
ast night, and on our test cluster of 504 OSDs, being polled by the
>>> internal prometheus and our external instance, the mgrs stopped responding
>>> and dropped out of the cluster entirely. This is impacting not just
>>> metrics, but the mgr itself. I think this is a high pr
Thanks for bringing this up.
We need to update Cheroot in Fedora and EPEL 8. I've opened
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-cheroot/pull-request/3 to
get this into Fedora first.
I've published an el8 RPM at
https://fedorapeople.org/~ktdreyer/bz1868629/ for early testing. I can
bring up a
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 9:25 AM David Galloway wrote:
> If there will be a 14.2.10 or 14.3.0 (I don't actually know), it will be
> built and signed for CentOS 8.
>
> Is this sufficient?
Yes, thanks!
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To
Hi David,
Some parts of OpenStack upstream CI consume the download.ceph.com
binaries for nautilus on CentOS 7, and the developers are asking if we
can provide nautilus builds for CentOS 8 as well.
What are the steps to do that for future Nautilus releases?
- Ken
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 7:54
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 6:03 AM Wido den Hollander wrote:
> And to add to this: No, a newly created RBD image will never have 'left
> over' bits and bytes from a previous RBD image.
>
> I had to explain this multiple times to people which were used to old
> (i)SCSI setups where partitions could
e permissions are correct:
chown -R ceph:ceph /var/lib/ceph/radosgw/
# Configure RGW as "done":
sudo -u ceph touch /var/lib/ceph/radosgw/ceph-rgw.ceph1/done
# Start the service:
systemctl enable --now ceph-radosgw@rgw.ceph1
# Create a RGW user:
radosgw-admin user create --uid=kdreyer --display-
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 3:34 PM Mazzystr wrote:
> - nothing provides libleveldb.so.1()(64bit) needed by
> ceph-osd-2:15.2.0-0.el8.x86_64
Does the OSD still use leveldb at all?
- Ken
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 8:03 AM Sasha Litvak
wrote:
>
> * I am bothered with a quality of the releases of a very complex system that
> can bring down a whole house and keep it down for a while. While I wish the
> QA would be perfect, I wonder if it would be practical to release new
> packages to
19 matches
Mail list logo
