[ceph-users] Re: CephFS: Isolating folders for different users

2023-01-02 Thread Venky Shankar
Hi Jonas, On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 10:52 PM Jonas Schwab wrote: > > Thank you very much! Works like a charm, except for one thing: I gave my > clients the MDS caps 'allow rws path=' to also be able > to create snapshots from the client, but `mkdir .snap/test` still returns > mkdir: cannot

[ceph-users] Re: CephFS: Isolating folders for different users

2023-01-02 Thread Robert Gallop
One side affect of using sub volumes is that you can then only take a snap at the sub volume level, nothing further down the tree. I find you can use the same path on the auth without the sub volume unless I’m missing something in this thread. On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 10:21 AM Jonas Schwab <

[ceph-users] Re: CephFS: Isolating folders for different users

2023-01-02 Thread Jonas Schwab
Thank you very much! Works like a charm, except for one thing: I gave my clients the MDS caps 'allow rws path=' to also be able to create snapshots from the client, but `mkdir .snap/test` still returns     mkdir: cannot create directory ‘.snap/test’: Operation not permitted Do you have an idea

[ceph-users] Re: CephFS: Isolating folders for different users

2022-12-24 Thread Milind Changire
You could try creating Subvolumes as well: https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/cephfs/fs-volumes/ As usual, ceph caps and data layout semantics apply to Subvolumes as well. On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 8:19 PM Jonas Schwab < jonas.sch...@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I would like

[ceph-users] Re: CephFS: Isolating folders for different users

2022-12-23 Thread Kai Stian Olstad
On 22.12.2022 15:47, Jonas Schwab wrote: Now the question: Since I established this setup more or less through trial and error, I was wondering if there is a more elegant/better approach than what is outlined above? You can use namespace so you don't need separate pools. Unfortunately the