[ceph-users] Re: Direct ceph mount on desktops

2024-02-07 Thread Tim Holloway
Followup. Desktop system went to sleep overnight. I woke up to this: HEALTH_WARN 1 client(s) laggy due to laggy OSDs; 1 clients failing to respond to capability release; 1 MDSs report slow requests [WRN] MDS_CLIENTS_LAGGY: 1 client(s) laggy due to laggy OSDs mds.ceefs.www2.lzjqgd(mds.0): Cli

[ceph-users] Re: Direct ceph mount on desktops

2024-02-06 Thread Tim Holloway
Unfortunately, it looks like the exact error text has already rolled off my logs. Earlier today something jammed up and I restarted ceph, which returned everything to a healthy state. But I'll take that as an indicator that ceph isn't a good match for sleeper systems. Fortunately, ganesha NFS is n

[ceph-users] Re: Direct ceph mount on desktops

2024-02-06 Thread Patrick Donnelly
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 12:09 PM Tim Holloway wrote: > > Back when I was battline Octopus, I had problems getting ganesha's NFS > to work reliably. I resolved this by doing a direct (ceph) mount on my > desktop machine instead of an NFS mount. > > I've since been plagued by ceph "laggy OSD" complai