A pleasure. Hope it helps :)
Happy to share if you need any more information Zac.
Cheers,
Tom
On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 at 18:14, Dan van der Ster
wrote:
> Thanks Tom, this is a very useful post!
> I've added our docs guy Zac in cc: IMHO this would be useful in a
> "Tips & Tricks" section of the
Thanks Tom, this is a very useful post!
I've added our docs guy Zac in cc: IMHO this would be useful in a
"Tips & Tricks" section of the docs.
-- dan
__
Clyso GmbH | https://www.clyso.com
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 7:46 AM Thomas Bennett wrote:
>
> I would second
I would second Joachim's suggestion - this is exactly what we're in the
process of doing for a client, i.e migrating from Luminous to Quincy.
However below would also work if you're moving to Nautilus.
The only catch with this plan would be if you plan to reuse any hardware -
i.e the hosts
Maybe he is limited by the supported OS
>
> I would create a new cluster with Quincy and would migrate the data from
> the old to the new cluster bucket by bucket. Nautilus is out of support
> and
> I would recommend at least to use a ceph version that is receiving
> Backports.
>
>
I would create a new cluster with Quincy and would migrate the data from
the old to the new cluster bucket by bucket. Nautilus is out of support and
I would recommend at least to use a ceph version that is receiving
Backports.
huxia...@horebdata.cn schrieb am Di., 25. Apr.
2023, 18:30:
> Dear
Thanks a lot for the valuable input, Wesley, Josh, and Anthony.
It seems the best practice would be upgrade first, and then expand, remove old
nodes afterwards.
best regards,
Samuel
huxia...@horebdata.cn
From: Wesley Dillingham
Date: 2023-04-25 19:55
To: huxia...@horebdata.cn
CC:
Get on nautilus first and (perhaps even go to pacific) before expansion.
Primarily for the reason that starting in nautilus degraded data recovery
will be prioritized over remapped data recovery. As you phase out old
hardware and phase in new hardware you will have a very large amount of
backfill
Hi Samuel,
While the second method would probably work fine in the happy path, if
something goes wrong I think you'll be happier having a uniform
release installed. In general, we've found the backfill experience to
be better on Nautilus than Luminous, so my vote would be for the first
method.
