[ceph-users] Re: How OSD encryption affects latency/iops on NVMe, SSD and HDD

2020-09-28 Thread tri
Some tests on dmcrypted (aes-xts-plain64, 512 bit) vs non-dmcrypted on a small SAS SSD drive. Latencies are reported at 99.9 percentile fio 4k, direct, sync, QD1 == WRITE READ IOPS LATENCIES(us)

[ceph-users] Re: How OSD encryption affects latency/iops on NVMe, SSD and HDD

2020-09-28 Thread Marc Roos
...@postix.net] Sent: maandag 28 september 2020 16:07 To: ceph-users@ceph.io Subject: [ceph-users] Re: How OSD encryption affects latency/iops on NVMe, SSD and HDD Some tests on dmcrypted (aes-xts-plain64, 512 bit) vs non-dmcrypted on a small SAS SSD drive. Latencies are reported at 99.9 percentile

[ceph-users] Re: How OSD encryption affects latency/iops on NVMe, SSD and HDD

2020-09-26 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 04:50:34PM +, t...@postix.net wrote: > Hi all, > > For those who use encryption on your OSDs, what effect do you see on > your NVMe, SSD and HDD vs non-encrypted OSDs? I tried to find some > info on this subject but there isn't much detail available. > > >From