[ceph-users] Re: Pacific Bug?

2024-04-02 Thread Adam King
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64428 should be it. Backports are done for quincy, reef, and squid and the patch will be present in the next release for each of those versions. There isn't a pacific backport as, afaik, there are no more pacific releases planned. On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 6:03 PM

[ceph-users] Re: Pacific Bug?

2024-03-29 Thread Alex
Hi again Adam :-) Would you happen to have the Bug Tracker issue for label bug? Thanks. ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io

[ceph-users] Re: Pacific Bug?

2024-02-14 Thread Alex
Thank you. Appreciate the prompt response. ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io

[ceph-users] Re: Pacific Bug?

2024-02-14 Thread Adam King
Does seem like a bug, actually in more than just this command. The `ceph orch host ls` with the --label and/or --host-pattern flag just piggybacks off of the existing filtering done for placements in service specs. I've just taken a look and you actually can create the same behavior with the

[ceph-users] Re: Pacific Bug?

2024-02-14 Thread Eugen Block
Hi, I don't think this is just limited to Pacific, besides the overriding nature of the label parameter, Reef also shows some weird results (it's an upgraded test cluster so don't mind the hostnames): nautilus:~ # ceph orch host ls HOST ADDR LABELS STATUS