[ceph-users] Re: Placement of block/db and WAL on SSD?

2020-07-05 Thread Lindsay Mathieson
On 5/07/2020 8:16 pm, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: But from what you are saying, the 500GB disk would have been gaining no benefit? I would be better off allocating 30GB (or 30GB)  for each disk? Edit: 30GB or 62GB (its a 127GB SSD) -- Lindsay ___

[ceph-users] Re: Placement of block/db and WAL on SSD?

2020-07-05 Thread Lindsay Mathieson
On 5/07/2020 7:38 pm, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: If the wal location is not explicitly specified, it goes together with the db. So it is on the SSD. Conversely, what happens with the block.db if I place the wal with --block.wal The db then stays with the data. Ah, so my 2nd reading was

[ceph-users] Re: Placement of block/db and WAL on SSD?

2020-07-05 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 6:57 AM Lindsay Mathieson wrote: > > Nautilus install. > > Documentation seems a bit ambiguous to me - this is for a spinner + SSD, > using ceph-volume > > If I put the block.db on the SSD with > > "ceph-volume lvm create --bluestore --data /dev/sdd --block.db >