hi Boris, it looks like your other questions have been covered but
i'll snipe this one:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 7:55 AM Boris Behrens wrote:
>
> How good is it handling bad HTTP request, sent by an attacker?)
rgw relies on the boost.beast library to parse these http requests.
that library has
I was assuming it had to do with scaling, ofcourse there is multiple ways to do
it.
Personally I don’t find scaling that way is reasonable but that’s design
decision, that way you would still have some control to do traffic engineering
On 19 Sept 2022, at 10:23, Konstantin Shalygin
Hi,
> On 19 Sep 2022, at 10:38, Tobias Urdin wrote:
>
> Why not scaleout HAproxy by adding multiple ones and use a TCP load balancer
> in front of multiple HAproxy instances or use BGP ECMP routing directly to
> split
> load between multiple HAproxy?
Because you can do this without "TCP load
Hi,
Actually rgw can handle SSL traffic, and updates of certs is just a restarting
of service. For client it will be reset of connection, client will make a new
one
We use keeaplived DR method for RGW's for a years
The only bottleneck in this setup is input traffic limited by LB. This also can
