Raised one PR to fix this, please see
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/51931.
Thanks
- Xiubo
On 5/24/23 23:52, Sandip Divekar wrote:
Hi Team,
I'm writing to bring to your attention an issue we have encountered with the
"mtime" (modification time) behavior for directories in the Ceph
Fernandes
; Simon Crosland
Subject: RE: [ceph-users] Re: Unexpected behavior of directory mtime after
being set explicitly
Hi Chris / Gregory,
Did you get a chance to investigate this issue ?
Thanks and Regards
Sandip Divekar
From: Sandip Divekar
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 11:16 PM
To: Chris
Subject: RE: [ceph-users] Re: Unexpected behavior of directory mtime after
being set explicitly
Hi Chris / Gregory,
Did you get a chance to investigate this issue ?
Thanks and Regards
Sandip Divekar
From: Sandip Divekar
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 11:16 PM
To: Chris Palmer
Simon Crosland
mailto:simon.crosl...@hitachivantara.com>>
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Re: Unexpected behavior of directory mtime after
being set explicitly
* EXTERNAL EMAIL *
Hi Sandip
Ceph servers (debian11/ceph base with Proxmox installed on top - NOT the ceph
that comes with Pro
oe
From: Gregory Farnum
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 8:43 PM
To: Sandip Divekar
Cc: Chris Palmer ; Gavin Lucas
; Joseph Fernandes
; Simon Crosland
; ceph-users@ceph.io; d...@ceph.io
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Re: Unexpected behavior of directory mtime after
being set explicitly
*
Hi Milind
It's Kernel Client.
Thanks
Sandip
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
: Re: [ceph-users] Re: Unexpected behavior of directory mtime after
being set explicitly
* EXTERNAL EMAIL *
Hi Sandip
Ceph servers (debian11/ceph base with Proxmox installed on top - NOT the ceph
that comes with Proxmox!):
ceph@pve1:~$ uname -a
Linux pve1 5.15.107-2-pve #1 SMP PVE
)
Thanks for your prompt reply.
Regards
Sandip Divekar
-Original Message-
From: Chris Palmer
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 7:25 PM
To:ceph-users@ceph.io
Subject: [ceph-users] Re: Unexpected behavior of directory mtime after being
set explicitly
* EXTERNAL EMAIL *
Hi
, May 25, 2023 8:43 PM
To: Sandip Divekar
Cc: Chris Palmer ; Gavin Lucas
; Joseph Fernandes
; Simon Crosland
; ceph-users@ceph.io; d...@ceph.io
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Re: Unexpected behavior of directory mtime after
being set explicitly
* EXTERNAL EMAIL *
I haven’t checked the logs, bu
;
> Thanks for your prompt reply.
>
> Regards
>Sandip Divekar
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Palmer
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 7:25 PM
> To: ceph-users@ceph.io
> Subject: [ceph-users] Re: Unexpected behavior of directory mtime after
> bein
>
> From: Milind Changire
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 4:24 PM
> To: Sandip Divekar
> Cc: ceph-users@ceph.io; d...@ceph.io
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Unexpected behavior of directory mtime after
> being set explicitly
>
> * EXTERNAL EMAIL *
> Sandip,
>
; d...@ceph.io
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Unexpected behavior of directory mtime after being
set explicitly
* EXTERNAL EMAIL *
Sandip,
What type of client are you using ?
kernel client or fuse client ?
If it's the kernel client, then it's a bug.
FYI - Pacific and Quincy fuse clients do
To: Sandip Divekar
Cc: ceph-users@ceph.io; d...@ceph.io
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Unexpected behavior of directory mtime after being
set explicitly
* EXTERNAL EMAIL *
Sandip,
What type of client are you using ?
kernel client or fuse client ?
If it's the kernel client, then it's a bug.
FYI
Sandip,
What type of client are you using ?
kernel client or fuse client ?
If it's the kernel client, then it's a bug.
FYI - Pacific and Quincy fuse clients do the right thing
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 9:24 PM Sandip Divekar <
sandip.dive...@hitachivantara.com> wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I'm writing
14 matches
Mail list logo
