[ceph-users] Re: pg_num != pgp_num - and unable to change.

2023-07-06 Thread Anthony D'Atri
Indeed. For clarity, this process is not the same as the pg_autoscaler. It's real easy to conflate the two, along with the balancer module, so I like to call that out to reduce confusion. > On Jul 6, 2023, at 18:01, Dan van der Ster wrote: > > Since nautilus, pgp_num (and pg_num) will be

[ceph-users] Re: pg_num != pgp_num - and unable to change.

2023-07-06 Thread Dan van der Ster
Hi Jesper, > In earlier versions of ceph (without autoscaler) I have only experienced > that setting pg_num and pgp_num took immidiate effect? That's correct -- in recent Ceph (since nautilus) you cannot manipulate pgp_num directly anymore. There is a backdoor setting (set pgp_num_actual ...)