Thanks Greg, Joao and David,
The concept why odd no. of monitors are preferred is clear to me, but still I
am not clear about the working of Paxos algorithm:
#1. All changes in any data structure of monitor whether it is monitor map, OSD
map, PG map, MDS map or CRUSH map; are made through
On 08/30/2014 08:03 AM, pragya jain wrote:
Thanks Greg, Joao and David,
The concept why odd no. of monitors are preferred is clear to me, but
still I am not clear about the working of Paxos algorithm:
#1. All changes in any data structure of monitor whether it is monitor
map, OSD map, PG map,
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Christian Balzer ch...@gol.com wrote:
Now, 1200 is not a power of two, but it makes sense. (12 x 100).
Should have been 600 and then upped to 1024.
At the time, there was a reason why doing that did not work, but I
don't remember the specifics. All messages
While adding some nodes to a ceph emperor cluster using ceph-deploy,
the new nodes somehow wound up with 0.80.1, which I think is a Firefly
release.
The ceph version on existing nodes:
$ ceph --version
ceph version 0.72.2 (a913ded2ff138aefb8cb84d347d72164099cfd60)
The repository on the new
Hello,
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 20:24:00 -0400 J David wrote:
While adding some nodes to a ceph emperor cluster using ceph-deploy,
the new nodes somehow wound up with 0.80.1, which I think is a Firefly
release.
This was asked and solved in the ceph-deploy with --release (--stable)
for dumpling?
Hello,
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 18:27:22 -0400 J David wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Christian Balzer ch...@gol.com wrote:
Now, 1200 is not a power of two, but it makes sense. (12 x 100).
Should have been 600 and then upped to 1024.
At the time, there was a reason why doing that
On 29/08/14 22:17, Sebastien Han wrote:
@Mark thanks trying this :)
Unfortunately using nobarrier and another dedicated SSD for the journal (plus
your ceph setting) didn’t bring much, now I can reach 3,5K IOPS.
By any chance, would it be possible for you to test with a single OSD SSD?
