Hi,
looks that some osds are down?!
What is the output of ceph osd tree
Udo
Am 25.09.2014 04:29, schrieb Aegeaner:
The cluster healthy state is WARN:
health HEALTH_WARN 118 pgs degraded; 8 pgs down; 59 pgs
incomplete; 28 pgs peering; 292 pgs stale; 87 pgs stuck inactive;
Hi again,
sorry - forgot my post... see
osdmap e421: 9 osds: 9 up, 9 in
shows that all your 9 osds are up!
Do you have trouble with your journal/filesystem?
Udo
Am 25.09.2014 08:01, schrieb Udo Lembke:
Hi,
looks that some osds are down?!
What is the output of ceph osd tree
Udo
Am
osd_op(client.4625.1:9005787)
.
This is due to external factors. For example, the network settings.
2014-09-25 10:05 GMT+04:00 Udo Lembke ulem...@polarzone.de:
Hi again,
sorry - forgot my post... see
osdmap e421: 9 osds: 9 up, 9 in
shows that all your 9 osds are up!
Do you have
Yeah, three of nine OSDs went down but I recreated them, but the pgs
cannot be recovered.
I don't know how to erase all the pgs, so I deleted all the osd pools,
including data and metadata … Now all pgs are active and clean...
I'm not sure if there are more elegant ways to deal with this.
Replies Inline :
Sahana Lokeshappa
Test Development Engineer I
SanDisk Corporation
3rd Floor, Bagmane Laurel, Bagmane Tech Park
C V Raman nagar, Bangalore 560093
T: +918042422283
sahana.lokesha...@sandisk.com
-Original Message-
From: Sage Weil [mailto:sw...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
Hi Craig,
Sorry for late response. Somehow missed this mail.
All osds are up and running. There were no specific logs related to this
activity. And, there are no IOs running right now. Few osds were made in and
out ,removed fully and recreated before these pgs coming to this stage.
I had tried
Hi All,
Here are the steps I followed, to get back all pgs to active+clean state. Still
don't know what is the root cause for this pg state.
1. Force create pgs which are in stale+down+peering
2. Stop osd.12
3. Mark osd.12 as lost
4. Start osd.12
5. All pgs were back to active+clean state
Hi,
That's strange. 3.13 is way before any changes that could have had any
such effect. Can you by any chance try with older kernels to see where
it starts misbehaving for you? 3.12? 3.10? 3.8?
my crush tunables are set to bobtail, so I can't go bellow 3.9, I will try 3.12
tomorrow
As Dieter asked, what replication level is this, I guess 1?
Yes, replication x1 for theses benchmarks.
Now at 3 nodes and 6 OSDs you're getting about the performance of a single
SSD, food for thought.
yes, sure . I don't have more nodes to test, but I would like to known if it's
scale more
thanks. i have not configured switch.
i just know about it.
在 2014-09-25 12:38:48，Irek Fasikhov malm...@gmail.com 写道：
You have configured the switch?
2014-09-25 5:07 GMT+04:00 yuelongguang fasts...@163.com:
hi,all
after i set mtu=9000, ceph-deply waits reply all the time ,
Guys,
Have done some testing with 3.16.3-031603-generic downloaded from Ubuntu utopic
branch. The hang task problem is gone when using large block size (tested with
1M and 4M) and I could no longer preproduce the hang tasks while doing 100 dd
tests in a for loop.
However, I can confirm that
Hi!
16 pgs in our ceph cluster are in active+clean+replay state more then one day.
All clients are working fine.
Is this ok?
root@bastet-mon1:/# ceph -w
cluster fffeafa2-a664-48a7-979a-517e3ffa0da1
health HEALTH_OK
monmap e3: 3 mons at
Right, I've stopped the tests because it is just getting ridiculous. Without
rbd cache enabled, dd tests run extremely slow:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/mount/1G bs=1M count=1000 oflag=direct
230+0 records in
230+0 records out
241172480 bytes (241 MB) copied, 929.71 s, 259 kB/s
Any thoughts
Hi,
I'm using ceph version 0.80.5
I trying to make work a ceph cluster using debian and systemd
I have already manage to install ceph cluster on debian with sysinit
without any problem
But after installing all, using ceph deploy without error
after rebooting not all my osd start (they are
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote:
Guys,
Have done some testing with 3.16.3-031603-generic downloaded from Ubuntu
utopic branch. The hang task problem is gone when using large block size
(tested with 1M and 4M) and I could no longer preproduce the
Karan,
Thanks for the tutorial, great stuff. Please note that in order to get the
graphs working, I had to install ipvsadm and create a symlink from
/sbin/ipvsadm to /usr/bin/ipvsadm (CentOS 6).
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Karan Singh karan.si...@csc.fi wrote:
Hello Cepher’s
Now here
Ilya,
I've not used rbd map on older kernels. Just experimenting with rbd map to have
an iscsi and nfs gateway service for hypervisors such as xenserver and vmware.
I've tried it with the latest ubuntu LTS kernel 3.13 I believe and noticed the
issue.
Can you not reproduce the hang tasks when
v0.67.11 Dumpling
===
This stable update for Dumpling fixes several important bugs that affect a
small set of users.
We recommend that all Dumpling users upgrade at their convenience. If
none of these issues are affecting your deployment there is no urgency.
Notable Changes
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote:
Ilya,
I've not used rbd map on older kernels. Just experimenting with rbd map to
have an iscsi and nfs gateway service for hypervisors such as xenserver and
vmware. I've tried it with the latest ubuntu LTS kernel
Hi!
We have an Icehouse system running with librbd based Cinder and Glance
configurations, storing images and volumes in Ceph.
Configuration is (apart from network setup details, of course) by the
book / OpenStack setup guide.
Works very nicely, including regular migration, but live migration
On 9/25/2014 11:09 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
v0.67.11 Dumpling
===
This stable update for Dumpling fixes several important bugs that affect a
small set of users.
We recommend that all Dumpling users upgrade at their convenience. If
none of these issues are affecting your deployment
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, Mike Dawson wrote:
On 9/25/2014 11:09 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
v0.67.11 Dumpling
===
This stable update for Dumpling fixes several important bugs that affect a
small set of users.
We recommend that all Dumpling users upgrade at their convenience.
Hi Mike,
On 25 Sep 2014, at 17:47, Mike Dawson mike.daw...@cloudapt.com wrote:
On 9/25/2014 11:09 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
v0.67.11 Dumpling
===
This stable update for Dumpling fixes several important bugs that affect a
small set of users.
We recommend that all Dumpling
Hi,
On 25/09/2014 17:53, Sage Weil wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, Mike Dawson wrote:
On 9/25/2014 11:09 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
v0.67.11 Dumpling
===
This stable update for Dumpling fixes several important bugs that affect a
small set of users.
We recommend that all Dumpling
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, Dan Van Der Ster wrote:
Hi Mike,
On 25 Sep 2014, at 17:47, Mike Dawson mike.daw...@cloudapt.com wrote:
On 9/25/2014 11:09 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
v0.67.11 Dumpling
===
This stable update for Dumpling fixes several important bugs that affect a
Can you explain this a little more, Johan? I've never even heard of
ipvsadmin or its facilities before today, and it ought not be required...
On Sep 25, 2014 7:04 AM, Johan Kooijman m...@johankooijman.com wrote:
Karan,
Thanks for the tutorial, great stuff. Please note that in order to get the
I imagine you aren't actually using the data/metadata pool that these
PGs are in, but it's a previously-reported bug we haven't identified:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8758
They should go away if you restart the OSDs that host them (or just
remove those pools), but it's not going to hurt
Looks like the packages have partially hit the repo, but at least the
following are missing:
Failed to fetch
http://ceph.com/debian-dumpling/pool/main/c/ceph/librbd1_0.67.11-1precise_amd64.deb
404 Not Found
Failed to fetch
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Mike Dawson mike.daw...@cloudapt.com wrote:
Looks like the packages have partially hit the repo, but at least the
following are missing:
Failed to fetch
http://ceph.com/debian-dumpling/pool/main/c/ceph/librbd1_0.67.11-1precise_amd64.deb
404 Not Found
Failed
Hi!
I imagine you aren't actually using the data/metadata pool that these
PGs are in, but it's a previously-reported bug we haven't identified:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8758
They should go away if you restart the OSDs that host them (or just
remove those pools), but it's not going to
Thanks Yehuda for your response, much appreciated.
Using the radosgw-admin object stat option I was able to reconcile the
objects on master and slave. There are 10 objects on the master that have
replicated to the slave, for these 10 objects I was able to confirm by pulling
the tag prefix
On 09/24/2014 04:57 PM, Brian Rak wrote:
I've been doing some testing of importing virtual machine images, and
I've found that 'rbd import' is at least 2x as slow as 'qemu-img
convert'. Is there anything I can do to speed this process up? I'd
like to use rbd import because it gives me a little
Hi,
I have several servers and each server has 4 disks.
Now I am going to setup Ceph on these servers and use all the 4 disks but it
seems one OSD instance can be configured with one backend storage.
So there seems two options to me:
1. Make the 4 disks into a raid0 then setup OSD to use this
Hi James,
the best practice is to set up 1 OSD daemon per physical disk drive.
In your case, each OSD node would hence be 4 OSD daemons using one physical
drive per daemon, and deploying a minimum of 3 servers so each object copy
resides on a separate physical server.
JC
On Sep 25, 2014,
Hello,
On my ceph cluster osd node . there is a rule to REJECT all.
As per the documentation, added a rule to allow the trafficon the full
range of ports,
But, the cluster will not come into clean state. Can you please share your
experience with the iptables configuration.
Following are the INPUT
35 matches
Mail list logo
