Gregiory Farnum wrote:
>
>
> You've probably noticed the RGW will create pools if it needs them and
> they don't exist. That's why it "needs" the extra monitor capabilities.
Yes, I have noticed that - and yes, automatically creating the pools
helpeda lot in a lab environment to setup my firs
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:20 PM Diedrich Ehlerding <
diedrich.ehlerd...@ts.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Thank you for your response. Yes, as I wrote, the gateway seems to
> work with these settings.
>
> The reason why I am considering the capabilities is: I am trying to
> attach a Openstack environment
Thank you for your response. Yes, as I wrote, the gateway seems to
work with these settings.
The reason why I am considering the capabilities is: I am trying to
attach a Openstack environment and a gateway to the same cluster,
and I would like to prevent the Openstack admin to access the S3
ga
Hi, everyone.
Recently, I’m reading the source code of Monitor. I found that, in
PGMonitor::preprare_pg_stats() method, a callback C_Stats is put into
PGMonitor::waiting_for_finished_proposal. I wonder, if a previous PGMap
incremental is in PAXOS's proposeaccept phase at the moment C_Stats
I don't work with the gateway but in general that should work.
That said, the RGW also sees all your client data going in so I'm not sure
how much you buy by locking it down. If you're just trying to protect
against accidents with the pools, you might give it write access on the
monitor; any failu
Hello all,
Had a recent issue with ceph monitors and osd's when connecting to
second/third monitor. I don't have any debug logs to currently paste, but
wanted to get feedback on my ceph.conf for the monitors.
This is giant release.
Here's the error from monB that stuck out "osd_map(174373..1743
You are trying to use the kernel client to map the RBD in Jewel. Jewel
RBDs have options enabled that require you to run a kernel 4.9 or newer.
You can disable the features that are requiring the newer kernel, but
that's not very good as those new features are very nice to have. You can
use RBD-f
Hi,
I'm trying to get files into radosgw (Ubuntu Ceph package
10.2.3-0ubuntu0.16.04.2) using Fine Uploader
https://github.com/FineUploader/fine-uploader but I'm running into
difficulties in the case where the uploaded file has a filename
extension which the browser can't map to a MIME type (or, no
How full is the cluster before adding the third node? If it's over 65% I
would recommend adding 2 new nodes instead of 1. The reason for that is
that it if you lose one of the nodes, your cluster will try to backfill
back onto the 2 nodes and be way too full. There is no rule or
recommendation a
Hi!
A customer is running a small two node ceph cluster with 14 disks each.
He has min_size 1 and size 2 and it is only used for backups.
If we add a third member with 14 identical disks and remain size = 2,
replicas should be distributed evenly, right?
Or is an uneven count of hosts unadvisable
Hi Cepher,
I have created a pool and trying to create rbd image on the ceph client, while
mapping the rbd image it fails as:
ubuntu@shambhucephnode0:~$ sudo rbd map pool1-img1 -p pool1
rbd: sysfs write failed
In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try "dmesg | tail" or so.
rbd: map failed
On 05/31/2017 05:21 AM, nokia ceph wrote:
+ ceph-devel ..
$ps -ef | grep 294
ceph 3539720 1 14 08:04 ?00:16:35 /usr/bin/ceph-osd -f
--cluster ceph --id 294 --setuser ceph --setgroup ceph
$gcore -o coredump-osd 3539720
$(gdb) bt
#0 0x7f5ef68f56d5 in pthread_cond_wait@
+ ceph-devel ..
$ps -ef | grep 294
ceph 3539720 1 14 08:04 ?00:16:35 /usr/bin/ceph-osd -f
--cluster ceph --id 294 --setuser ceph --setgroup ceph
$gcore -o coredump-osd 3539720
$(gdb) bt
#0 0x7f5ef68f56d5 in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from
/lib64/libpthread.so.0
#1
Hello.
The documentation which I found proposes to create the ceph client
for a rados gateway with very global capabilities, namely
"mon allow rwx, osd allow rwx".
Are there any reasons for these very global capabilities (allowing
this client to access and modify (even remove) all pools, all r
14 matches
Mail list logo
