Re: [ceph-users] Cannot write to cephfs if some osd's are not available on the client network

now this goes against what I thought I learned about ceph fs. You should be able to RW to/from all OSDs, how can it be limited to only a single OSD?? On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 4:30 AM Christopher Blum wrote: > I wouldn't recommend you pursuit this any further, but if this is the only > client

[ceph-users] mds will not activate

I had to reboot my mds. The hot spare did not kick in and now I am showing the filesystem is degraded and offline. Both mds are showing as up:standby. I am not sure how to proceed. cluster: id: 188c7fba-288f-45e9-bca1-cc5fceccd2a1 health: HEALTH_ERR 1 filesystem is

Re: [ceph-users] MDS damaged after mimic 13.2.1 to 13.2.2 upgrade

I'm at scan_links now, will post an update once it has finished. Have you reset the journal after fs recovery as suggested in the doc? quote: If the damaged filesystem contains dirty journal data, it may be recovered next with: cephfs-journal-tool --rank=:0 event recover_dentries list

Re: [ceph-users] list admin issues

> perhaps it wouldn't be so bad to actually trying to figure this one out? > > > > So can the maintainers of this list please investigate what actually > gets bounced? Look at my address if you want. > > I got disabled 20181006, 20180927, 20180916, 20180725, 201807

Re: [ceph-users] list admin issues

n to something, is this intentional? > > Reality is that there is a lot of ceph-users with Gmail accounts, > perhaps it wouldn't be so bad to actually trying to figure this one out? > > > > So can the maintainers of this list please investigate what actually > gets bounce

Re: [ceph-users] list admin issues

the maintainers of this list please investigate what actually gets > bounced? Look at my address if you want. > I got disabled 20181006, 20180927, 20180916, 20180725, 20180718 most recently. > Please help! > > Thanks, > Elias > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:41 AM Christian Balzer w

Re: [ceph-users] list admin issues

t; > perhaps it wouldn't be so bad to actually trying to figure this one > > > > > out? > > > > > > > > > > So can the maintainers of this list please investigate what actually > > > > > gets bou

Re: [ceph-users] list admin issues

actually trying to figure this one out? > > > > So can the maintainers of this list please investigate what actually > gets bounced? Look at my address if you want. > > I got disabled 20181006, 20180927, 20180916, 20180725, 20180718 most > recently. > > Please h

Re: [ceph-users] list admin issues

o something, is this intentional? > > Reality is that there is a lot of ceph-users with Gmail accounts, > perhaps it wouldn't be so bad to actually trying to figure this one out? > > > > So can the maintainers of this list please investigate what actually > gets bounced? Look at my

Re: [ceph-users] list admin issues

lease investigate what actually gets > bounced? Look at my address if you want. > I got disabled 20181006, 20180927, 20180916, 20180725, 20180718 most recently. > Please help! Same here. -- May the most significant bit of your life be positive. _

Re: [ceph-users] list admin issues

Thanks! Do you have bounce message from google in such case (for example for my account v.tols...@selfip.ru ) сб, 6 окт. 2018 г. в 17:43, Marc Roos : > > Of course it is possible, should be easy to track in log files, looks > like all messages originate from the same host. Let me know what gmail >

Re: [ceph-users] list admin issues

Of course it is possible, should be easy to track in log files, looks like all messages originate from the same host. Let me know what gmail says. Received: from spam1.roosit.eu (spam1.roosit.eu [212.26.193.45]) by sx.f1-outsourcing.eu (Scalix SMTP Relay 11.4.6.13676) via ESMTP; Sat,

Re: [ceph-users] list admin issues

сб, 6 окт. 2018 г. в 16:48, Marc Roos : > I have such problems too. And also i have address on gmail (my own domain). I'm asked from list admins to provide bounce message to contact google team. But after three days nobody answered. I don't think that is possible to ask google without message

Re: [ceph-users] list admin issues

erhaps > it wouldn't be so bad to actually trying to figure this one out? > > So can the maintainers of this list please investigate what actually gets > bounced? Look at my address if you want. > I got disabled 20181006, 20180927, 20180916, 20180725, 20180718 most > recently. > Please

Re: [ceph-users] list admin issues

it wouldn't be so bad to actually trying to figure this one out? So can the maintainers of this list please investigate what actually gets bounced? Look at my address if you want. I got disabled 20181006, 20180927, 20180916, 20180725, 20180718 most recently. Please help! Thanks, Elias On Mon

Re: [ceph-users] list admin issues

can the maintainers of this list please investigate what actually gets > bounced? Look at my address if you want. > I got disabled 20181006, 20180927, 20180916, 20180725, 20180718 most > recently. > Please help! > > Thanks, > Elias > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:41 A

Re: [ceph-users] list admin issues

? Reality is that there is a lot of ceph-users with Gmail accounts, perhaps it wouldn't be so bad to actually trying to figure this one out? So can the maintainers of this list please investigate what actually gets bounced? Look at my address if you want. I got disabled 20181006, 20180927, 20180916

Re: [ceph-users] Inconsistent directory content in cephfs

Hi, On 05.10.2018 15:33, Sergey Malinin wrote: Are you sure these mounts (work/*06* and work/*6c*) refer to the same directory? On 5.10.2018, at 13:57, Burkhard Linke > wrote: root@host2:~# ls /ceph/sge-tmp/db/work/06/ | wc -l ...

Re: [ceph-users] Cannot write to cephfs if some osd's are not available on the client network

I wouldn't recommend you pursuit this any further, but if this is the only client that would reside on the same VM as the OSD, one thing you could try is to decrease the primary affinity to 0 [1] for the local OSD . That way that single OSD would never become a primary OSD ;) Disclaimer: This is