Re: [ceph-users] Prometheus RADOSGW usage exporter

My apologies, I don't seem to be getting notifications on PRs. I'll review this week. Thanks, Berant On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 5:55 AM, Konstantin Shalygin wrote: > Hi Berant > > > I've created prometheus exporter that scrapes the RADOSGW Admin Ops API and >> exports the usage

Re: [ceph-users] Prometheus RADOSGW usage exporter

'owner'] > > Kind regards, > > Ben Morrice > > __ > Ben Morrice | e: ben.morr...@epfl.ch | t: +41-21-693-9670 > <+41%2021%20693%2096%2070> > EPFL / BBP > Biotech Campus > Chemin des Mines 9 &g

[ceph-users] Prometheus RADOSGW usage exporter

Hello all, I've created prometheus exporter that scrapes the RADOSGW Admin Ops API and exports the usage information for all users and buckets. This is my first prometheus exporter so if anyone has feedback I'd greatly appreciate it. I've tested it against Hammer, and will shortly test against

Re: [ceph-users] OSD unable to start (giant - hammer)

at 7:13 PM, Berant Lemmenes ber...@lemmenes.com wrote: Sam, It is for a valid pool, however the up and acting sets for 2.14 both show OSDs 8 7. I'll take a look at 7 8 and see if they are good. If so, it seems like it being present on osd.3 could be an artifact from previous topologies

Re: [ceph-users] OSD unable to start (giant - hammer)

for the assistance! Berant On Tuesday, May 19, 2015, Samuel Just sj...@redhat.com wrote: If 2.14 is part of a non-existent pool, you should be able to rename it out of current/ in the osd directory to prevent the osd from seeing it on startup. -Sam - Original Message - From: Berant Lemmenes ber

Re: [ceph-users] OSD unable to start (giant - hammer)

: []}}, { name: Started, enter_time: 2015-05-18 10:18:05.335040}], agent_state: {}} On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Berant Lemmenes ber...@lemmenes.com wrote: Sam, Thanks for taking a look. It does seem to fit my issue. Would just removing the 5.0_head directory be appropriate

[ceph-users] OSD unable to start (giant - hammer)

Hello all, I've encountered a problem when upgrading my single node home cluster from giant to hammer, and I would greatly appreciate any insight. I upgraded the packages like normal, then proceeded to restart the mon and once that came back restarted the first OSD (osd.3). However it

Re: [ceph-users] OSD unable to start (giant - hammer)

://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11429. There are some workarounds in the bugs marked as duplicates of that bug, or you can wait for the next hammer point release. -Sam - Original Message - From: Berant Lemmenes ber...@lemmenes.com To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 10:24:38 AM

Re: [ceph-users] Cephfs upon Tiering

Greg, So is the consensus that the appropriate way to implement this scenario is to have the fs created on the EC backing pool vs. the cache pool but that the UI check needs to be tweaked to distinguish between this scenario and just trying to use a EC pool alone? I'm also interested in the

Re: [ceph-users] No monitor sockets after upgrading to Emperor

Argh, premature email sending! On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Berant Lemmenes ber...@lemmenes.comwrote: On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Alfredo Deza alfredo.d...@inktank.comwrote: This is just one of the items that caught my attention: 2013-10-29 15:56:03,982 [ceph11][ERROR ] 2013

Re: [ceph-users] No monitor sockets after upgrading to Emperor

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Joao Eduardo Luis joao.l...@inktank.comwrote: This looks an awful lot like you started another instance of an OSD with the same ID while another was running. I'll walk you through the log lines that point me towards this conclusion. Would still be weird if

Re: [ceph-users] No monitor sockets after upgrading to Emperor

I noticed the same behavior on my dumpling cluster. They wouldn't show up after boot, but after a service restart they were there. I haven't tested a node reboot since I upgraded to emperor today. I'll give it a shot tomorrow. Thanks, Berant On Nov 11, 2013 9:29 PM, Peter Matulis

Re: [ceph-users] Cluster unable to finish balancing

it actually does? Thanks in advance. Berant On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Berant Lemmenes ber...@lemmenes.com wrote: TL;DR bobtail Ceph cluster unable to finish rebalance after drive failure, usage increasing even with no clients connected. I've been running a test bobtail cluster

[ceph-users] Cluster unable to finish balancing

TL;DR bobtail Ceph cluster unable to finish rebalance after drive failure, usage increasing even with no clients connected. I've been running a test bobtail cluster for a couple of months and it's been working great. Last week I had a drive die and rebalance; durring that time another OSD