Re: [ceph-users] Proxmox/ceph upgrade and addition of a new node/OSDs

2018-09-21 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 09:03:15AM +0200, Hervé Ballans wrote: > Hi MJ (and all), > > So we upgraded our Proxmox/Ceph cluster, and if we have to summarize the > operation in a few words : overall, everything went well :) > The most critical operation of all is the 'osd crush tunables optimal', I >

Re: [ceph-users] [Ceph-maintainers] download.ceph.com repository changes

2018-08-02 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 11:36:55AM -0600, Ken Dreyer wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 1:28 AM, Fabian Grünbichler > wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:38:43AM -0400, Alfredo Deza wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> After the 12.2.6 release went out, we've

Re: [ceph-users] [Ceph-maintainers] download.ceph.com repository changes

2018-07-27 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:38:43AM -0400, Alfredo Deza wrote: > Hi all, > > After the 12.2.6 release went out, we've been thinking on better ways > to remove a version from our repositories to prevent users from > upgrading/installing a known bad release. > > The way our repos are structured toda

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph Mimic on Debian 9 Stretch

2018-06-19 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 07:15:49PM +, Sage Weil wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jun 2018, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: > > it's of course within your purview as upstream project (lead) to define > > certain platforms/architectures/distros as fully supported, and others > > as be

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph Mimic on Debian 9 Stretch

2018-06-18 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 12:36:50PM +, Sage Weil wrote: > Hi Fabian, thanks for your quick, and sorry for my delayed response (only having 1.5 usable arms atm). > > On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 06:39:08PM +, Sage Weil wrote

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph Mimic on Debian 9 Stretch

2018-06-13 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 06:39:08PM +, Sage Weil wrote: > [adding ceph-maintainers] [and ceph-devel] > > On Mon, 4 Jun 2018, Charles Alva wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > > > When will the Ceph Mimic packages for Debian Stretch released? I could not > > find the packages even after changing the sourc

Re: [ceph-users] No more Luminous packages for Debian Jessie ??

2018-03-07 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 02:04:52PM +0100, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:24:50AM +0100, Florent B wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Since yesterday, the "ceph-luminous" repository does not contain any > > package for Debian Jessie. > > &g

Re: [ceph-users] No more Luminous packages for Debian Jessie ??

2018-03-07 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:24:50AM +0100, Florent B wrote: > Hi, > > Since yesterday, the "ceph-luminous" repository does not contain any > package for Debian Jessie. > > Is it expected ? AFAICT the packages are all there[2], but the Packages file only references the ceph-deploy package so apt d

Re: [ceph-users] ceph-volume lvm deactivate/destroy/zap

2018-01-09 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 02:14:51PM -0500, Alfredo Deza wrote: > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Reed Dier wrote: > > I would just like to mirror what Dan van der Ster’s sentiments are. > > > > As someone attempting to move an OSD to bluestore, with limited/no LVM > > experience, it is a completely

Re: [ceph-users] Hangs with qemu/libvirt/rbd when one host disappears

2017-12-07 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 09:59:43AM +0100, Marcus Priesch wrote: > Hello Brad, > > thanks for your answer ! > > >> at least the point of all is that a single host should be allowed to > >> fail and the vm's continue running ... ;) > > > > You don't really have six MONs do you (although I know the

Re: [ceph-users] Increasing mon_pg_warn_max_per_osd in v12.2.2

2017-12-04 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 11:21:42AM +0100, SOLTECSIS - Victor Rodriguez Cortes wrote: > > > Why are you OK with this? A high amount of PGs can cause serious peering > > issues. OSDs might eat up a lot of memory and CPU after a reboot or such. > > > > Wido > > Mainly because there was no warning

Re: [ceph-users] ceph-disk removal roadmap (was ceph-disk is now deprecated)

2017-12-01 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 11:25:03AM -0500, Alfredo Deza wrote: > Thanks all for your feedback on deprecating ceph-disk, we are very > excited to be able to move forwards on a much more robust tool and > process for deploying and handling activation of OSDs, removing the > dependency on UDEV which ha

Re: [ceph-users] ceph-disk is now deprecated

2017-11-30 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 07:04:33AM -0500, Alfredo Deza wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 6:31 AM, Fabian Grünbichler > wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:39:31AM -0800, Vasu Kulkarni wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:22 AM, David Turner > >> wrote: >

Re: [ceph-users] ceph-disk is now deprecated

2017-11-30 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:39:31AM -0800, Vasu Kulkarni wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:22 AM, David Turner wrote: > > Isn't marking something as deprecated meaning that there is a better option > > that we want you to use and you should switch to it sooner than later? I > > don't understand ho

Re: [ceph-users] [Ceph-announce] Luminous v12.2.1 released

2017-10-02 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 05:46:30PM +0200, Abhishek wrote: > This is the first bugfix release of Luminous v12.2.x long term stable > release series. It contains a range of bug fixes and a few features > across CephFS, RBD & RGW. We recommend all the users of 12.2.x series > update. > > For more det

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph packages for Debian Stretch?

2017-06-21 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 05:30:02PM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote: > > Hello, > > On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:47:08 +0200 (CEST) Alexandre DERUMIER wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Proxmox is maintening a ceph-luminous repo for stretch > > > > http://download.proxmox.com/debian/ceph-luminous/ > > > > > >

[ceph-users] sortbitwise warning broken on Ceph Jewel?

2017-05-16 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
The Kraken release notes[1] contain the following note about the sortbitwise flag and upgrading from <= Jewel to > Jewel: The sortbitwise flag must be set on the Jewel cluster before upgrading to Kraken. The latest Jewel (10.2.4+) releases issue a health warning if the flag is not set, so this is

Re: [ceph-users] Automatic OSD start on Jewel

2017-01-04 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 12:55:56PM +0100, Florent B wrote: > On 01/04/2017 12:18 PM, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 12:03:39PM +0100, Florent B wrote: > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> I have a problem with automatic start of OSDs o

Re: [ceph-users] Automatic OSD start on Jewel

2017-01-04 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 12:03:39PM +0100, Florent B wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have a problem with automatic start of OSDs on Debian Jessie with Ceph > Jewel. > > My osd.0 is using /dev/sda5 for data and /dev/sda2 for journal, it is > listed in ceph-disk list : > > /dev/sda : > /dev/sda1 other