we are a little stuck where to search for a solution.
What debug output would help to see whether we have a disk or network problem
here ?
Thankx for your input !
Marcus Haarmann
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.
Ceph is running as non-root user, so normally it is not permitted
to listen to a port < 1024 for non-root users.
This is not specific to ceph.
You could trick a listener on port 80 with a redirect via iptables or you might
proxy the connection
through an apache/nginx instance.
Mar
Its a feature ...
http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/cephfs/dirfrags/
https://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-users/msg31473.html
Marcus Haarmann
Von: donglifec...@gmail.com
An: "zyan" <z...@redhat.com>
CC: "ceph-users" <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
Gesendet: Fre
stores each file as a single object, while
the rbd is configured
to allocate larger objects.
Marcus Haarmann
Von: "Stijn De Weirdt" <stijn.dewei...@ugent.be>
An: "ceph-users" <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. August 2017 10:34:48
Betreff:
that a filesystem
or a database
could become inconsistent easier than a rados-only approach.
Even cephfs was not the right approach since the space consumption would be the
same as with
rados directly.
Thanks to everybody,
Marcus Haarmann
Von: "Pavel Shub" <pa...@citymaps.com>
An:
Thank you all in advance for support.
Marcus Haarmann
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com