On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 03:11:44PM +0200, Marc Roos wrote:
> Double thanks for the on-topic reply. The other two repsonses, were
> making me doubt if my chinese (which I didn't study) is better than my
> english.
They were almost on topic, but not that useful. Please don't imply
language
Double thanks for the on-topic reply. The other two repsonses, were
making
me doubt if my chinese (which I didn't study) is better than my english.
>> I am a bit curious on how production ceph clusters are being used. I
am
>> reading here that the block storage is used a lot with
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:10:02PM +0200, Marc Roos wrote:
> I am a bit curious on how production ceph clusters are being used. I am
> reading here that the block storage is used a lot with openstack and
> proxmox, and via iscsi with vmare.
Have you looked at the Ceph User Surveys/Census?
> On Apr 19, 2019, at 10:59 AM, Janne Johansson wrote:
>
> May the most significant bit of your life be positive.
Marc, my favorite thing about open source software is it has a 100% money back
satisfaction guarantee: If you are not completely satisfied, you can have an
instant refund, just
Den fre 19 apr. 2019 kl 12:10 skrev Marc Roos :
>
> [...]since nobody here is interested in a better rgw client for end
> users. I am wondering if the rgw is even being used like this, and what
> most production environments look like.
>
>
"Like this" ?
People use tons of scriptable and built-in
I am a bit curious on how production ceph clusters are being used. I am
reading here that the block storage is used a lot with openstack and
proxmox, and via iscsi with vmare.
But I since nobody here is interested in a better rgw client for end
users. I am wondering if the rgw is even being
