Re: [ceph-users] CephFS + CTDB/Samba - MDS session timeout on lockfile

2016-05-16 Thread Nick Fisk
> -Original Message- > From: Eric Eastman [mailto:eric.east...@keepertech.com] > Sent: 11 May 2016 16:02 > To: Nick Fisk <n...@fisk.me.uk> > Cc: Ceph Users <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] CephFS + CTDB/Samba - MDS session timeout on

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS + CTDB/Samba - MDS session timeout on lockfile

2016-05-11 Thread Eric Eastman
; From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf >> >> Of Nick Fisk >> >> Sent: 10 May 2016 13:30 >> >> To: 'Eric Eastman' <eric.east...@keepertech.com> >> >> Cc: 'Ceph Users' <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> >>

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS + CTDB/Samba - MDS session timeout on lockfile

2016-05-11 Thread Nick Fisk
> -Original Message- > From: Eric Eastman [mailto:eric.east...@keepertech.com] > Sent: 10 May 2016 18:29 > To: Nick Fisk <n...@fisk.me.uk> > Cc: Ceph Users <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] CephFS + CTDB/Samba - MDS session timeout on

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS + CTDB/Samba - MDS session timeout on lockfile

2016-05-10 Thread Eric Eastman
...@keepertech.com> >> Cc: 'Ceph Users' <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> >> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] CephFS + CTDB/Samba - MDS session timeout on >> lockfile >> > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Nick Fisk <n...@fisk.me.uk> wrote: >> > > Hi Eric, >

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS + CTDB/Samba - MDS session timeout on lockfile

2016-05-10 Thread Nick Fisk
-users] CephFS + CTDB/Samba - MDS session timeout on > lockfile > > > -Original Message- > > From: Eric Eastman [mailto:eric.east...@keepertech.com] > > Sent: 09 May 2016 23:09 > > To: Nick Fisk <n...@fisk.me.uk> > > Cc: Ceph Users <ceph-users@l

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS + CTDB/Samba - MDS session timeout on lockfile

2016-05-10 Thread Nick Fisk
> -Original Message- > From: Eric Eastman [mailto:eric.east...@keepertech.com] > Sent: 09 May 2016 23:09 > To: Nick Fisk <n...@fisk.me.uk> > Cc: Ceph Users <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] CephFS + CTDB/Samba - MDS session timeout on

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS + CTDB/Samba - MDS session timeout on lockfile

2016-05-09 Thread Nick Fisk
Hi Eric, > -Original Message- > From: Eric Eastman [mailto:eric.east...@keepertech.com] > Sent: 09 May 2016 19:21 > To: Nick Fisk <n...@fisk.me.uk> > Cc: Ceph Users <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] CephFS + CTDB/Samba - MDS session t

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS + CTDB/Samba - MDS session timeout on lockfile

2016-05-09 Thread Eric Eastman
I am trying to do some similar testing with SAMBA and CTDB with the Ceph file system. Are you using the vfs_ceph SAMBA module or are you kernel mounting the Ceph file system? Thanks Eric On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Nick Fisk wrote: > Hi All, > > I've been testing an

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS + CTDB/Samba - MDS session timeout on lockfile

2016-05-09 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > On Mon, 9 May 2016, Nick Fisk wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I've been testing an active/active Samba cluster over CephFS, performance >> seems really good with small files compared to Gluster. Soft reboots work >> beautifully with

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS + CTDB/Samba - MDS session timeout on lockfile

2016-05-09 Thread Sage Weil
On Mon, 9 May 2016, Nick Fisk wrote: > Hi All, > > I've been testing an active/active Samba cluster over CephFS, performance > seems really good with small files compared to Gluster. Soft reboots work > beautifully with little to no interruption in file access. However when I > perform a hard

[ceph-users] CephFS + CTDB/Samba - MDS session timeout on lockfile

2016-05-09 Thread Nick Fisk
Hi All, I've been testing an active/active Samba cluster over CephFS, performance seems really good with small files compared to Gluster. Soft reboots work beautifully with little to no interruption in file access. However when I perform a hard shutdown/reboot of one of the samba nodes, the