> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Eastman [mailto:eric.east...@keepertech.com]
> Sent: 11 May 2016 16:02
> To: Nick Fisk <n...@fisk.me.uk>
> Cc: Ceph Users <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] CephFS + CTDB/Samba - MDS session timeout on
; From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf
>> >> Of Nick Fisk
>> >> Sent: 10 May 2016 13:30
>> >> To: 'Eric Eastman' <eric.east...@keepertech.com>
>> >> Cc: 'Ceph Users' <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Eastman [mailto:eric.east...@keepertech.com]
> Sent: 10 May 2016 18:29
> To: Nick Fisk <n...@fisk.me.uk>
> Cc: Ceph Users <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] CephFS + CTDB/Samba - MDS session timeout on
...@keepertech.com>
>> Cc: 'Ceph Users' <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
>> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] CephFS + CTDB/Samba - MDS session timeout on
>> lockfile
>> > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Nick Fisk <n...@fisk.me.uk> wrote:
>> > > Hi Eric,
>
-users] CephFS + CTDB/Samba - MDS session timeout on
> lockfile
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Eric Eastman [mailto:eric.east...@keepertech.com]
> > Sent: 09 May 2016 23:09
> > To: Nick Fisk <n...@fisk.me.uk>
> > Cc: Ceph Users <ceph-users@l
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Eastman [mailto:eric.east...@keepertech.com]
> Sent: 09 May 2016 23:09
> To: Nick Fisk <n...@fisk.me.uk>
> Cc: Ceph Users <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] CephFS + CTDB/Samba - MDS session timeout on
Hi Eric,
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Eastman [mailto:eric.east...@keepertech.com]
> Sent: 09 May 2016 19:21
> To: Nick Fisk <n...@fisk.me.uk>
> Cc: Ceph Users <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] CephFS + CTDB/Samba - MDS session t
I am trying to do some similar testing with SAMBA and CTDB with the
Ceph file system. Are you using the vfs_ceph SAMBA module or are you
kernel mounting the Ceph file system?
Thanks
Eric
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Nick Fisk wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've been testing an
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Mon, 9 May 2016, Nick Fisk wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've been testing an active/active Samba cluster over CephFS, performance
>> seems really good with small files compared to Gluster. Soft reboots work
>> beautifully with
On Mon, 9 May 2016, Nick Fisk wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've been testing an active/active Samba cluster over CephFS, performance
> seems really good with small files compared to Gluster. Soft reboots work
> beautifully with little to no interruption in file access. However when I
> perform a hard
Hi All,
I've been testing an active/active Samba cluster over CephFS, performance
seems really good with small files compared to Gluster. Soft reboots work
beautifully with little to no interruption in file access. However when I
perform a hard shutdown/reboot of one of the samba nodes, the
11 matches
Mail list logo