Thanks Mark and Scottix for the helpful comments.
Cheers.
- jupiter
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:06 AM, Scottix scot...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll be more of a third-party person and try to be factual. =)
I wouldn't throw off Gluster too fast yet.
Besides what you described with the object and disk
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the comments, that was the same arguments people concern
CephFS performance here. But one thing I like the Ceph is it is
capable to run everything including replications directly to XFS on
commodity hardware disks, I am not clear if the Lustre can do it as
well, or did you
I'll be more of a third-party person and try to be factual. =)
I wouldn't throw off Gluster too fast yet.
Besides what you described with the object and disk storage.
It uses Amazon Dynamo paper on eventually consistent methodology of
organizing data.
Gluster has different features so I would
Hi,
I'd like to deploy Cephfs in a cluster, but I need to have a performance
report compared with Lustre and Gluster. Could anyone point me documents /
links for performance between CephFS, Gluster and Lustre?
Thank you.
Kind regards,
- j
___
On 08/03/2015 06:31 AM, jupiter wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to deploy Cephfs in a cluster, but I need to have a performance
report compared with Lustre and Gluster. Could anyone point me documents
/ links for performance between CephFS, Gluster and Lustre?
Thank you.
Kind regards,
- j
Hi,
I don't
