Re: [ceph-users] Client forward compatibility

2014-12-01 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:00 AM, Dan Van Der Ster daniel.vanders...@cern.ch wrote: Hi Greg, On 24 Nov 2014, at 22:01, Gregory Farnum g...@gregs42.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Dan van der Ster daniel.vanders...@cern.ch wrote: Hi all, What is compatibility/incompatibility of

Re: [ceph-users] Client forward compatibility

2014-11-25 Thread Dan Van Der Ster
Hi Greg, On 24 Nov 2014, at 22:01, Gregory Farnum g...@gregs42.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Dan van der Ster daniel.vanders...@cern.ch wrote: Hi all, What is compatibility/incompatibility of dumpling clients to talk to firefly and giant clusters? We sadly don't have a

Re: [ceph-users] Client forward compatibility

2014-11-24 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Dan van der Ster daniel.vanders...@cern.ch wrote: Hi all, What is compatibility/incompatibility of dumpling clients to talk to firefly and giant clusters? We sadly don't have a good matrix about this yet, but in general you should assume that anything which

[ceph-users] Client forward compatibility

2014-11-20 Thread Dan van der Ster
Hi all, What is compatibility/incompatibility of dumpling clients to talk to firefly and giant clusters? I know that tunables=firefly will prevent dumpling clients from talking to a firefly cluster, but how about the existence or not of erasure pools? Can a dumpling client talk to a Firefly/Giant