Thank you very much Paul.
Kevin
Am Do., 20. Sep. 2018 um 15:19 Uhr schrieb Paul Emmerich <
paul.emmer...@croit.io>:
> Hi,
>
> device classes are internally represented as completely independent
> trees/roots; showing them in one tree is just syntactic sugar.
>
> For example, if you have a
Hi,
device classes are internally represented as completely independent
trees/roots; showing them in one tree is just syntactic sugar.
For example, if you have a hierarchy like root --> host1, host2, host3
--> nvme/ssd/sata OSDs, then you'll actually have 3 trees:
root~ssd -> host1~ssd,
To answer my own question:
ceph osd crush tree --show-shadow
Sorry for the noise...
Am Do., 20. Sep. 2018 um 14:54 Uhr schrieb Kevin Olbrich :
> Hi!
>
> Currently I have a cluster with four hosts and 4x HDDs + 4 SSDs per host.
> I also have replication rules to distinguish between HDD and SSD
Hi!
Currently I have a cluster with four hosts and 4x HDDs + 4 SSDs per host.
I also have replication rules to distinguish between HDD and SSD (and
failure-domain set to rack) which are mapped to pools.
What happens if I add a heterogeneous host with 1x SSD and 1x NVMe (where
NVMe will be a new
