Re: [ceph-users] Hammer Cache Tiering

2016-11-01 Thread Ashley Merrick
: Wednesday, 2 November 2016 12:57 PM To: Ashley Merrick <ash...@amerrick.co.uk> Cc: Christian Balzer <ch...@gol.com>; ceph-us...@ceph.com Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Hammer Cache Tiering On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Ashley Merrick <ash...@amerrick.co.uk<mailto:ash...@amerrick.co

Re: [ceph-users] Hammer Cache Tiering

2016-11-01 Thread Christian Wuerdig
nd - typically you want a cache for fast read access (i.e. serving very frequently read data as fast as possible). > > ,Ashley > > -Original Message- > From: Christian Balzer [mailto:ch...@gol.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 2 November 2016 11:48 AM > To: ceph-us...@ceph.com > Cc

Re: [ceph-users] Hammer Cache Tiering

2016-11-01 Thread Ashley Merrick
Merrick <ash...@amerrick.co.uk> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Hammer Cache Tiering Hello, On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:07:33 + Ashley Merrick wrote: > Hello, > > Currently using a Proxmox & CEPH cluster, currently they are running on > Hammer looking to update to Jewel sh

Re: [ceph-users] Hammer Cache Tiering

2016-11-01 Thread Christian Balzer
Hello, On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:07:33 + Ashley Merrick wrote: > Hello, > > Currently using a Proxmox & CEPH cluster, currently they are running on > Hammer looking to update to Jewel shortly, I know I can do a manual upgrade > however would like to keep what is tested well with Proxmox. >

[ceph-users] Hammer Cache Tiering

2016-11-01 Thread Ashley Merrick
Hello, Currently using a Proxmox & CEPH cluster, currently they are running on Hammer looking to update to Jewel shortly, I know I can do a manual upgrade however would like to keep what is tested well with Proxmox. Looking to put a SSD Cache tier in front, however have seen and read there has