Also putting this on the list.
On 06 Sep 2014, at 13:36, Josef Johansson jo...@oderland.se wrote:
Hi,
Same issues again, but I think we found the drive that causes the problems.
But this is causing problems as it’s trying to do a recover to that osd at
the moment.
So we’re left with
Hello,
On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 13:37:25 +0200 Josef Johansson wrote:
Also putting this on the list.
On 06 Sep 2014, at 13:36, Josef Johansson jo...@oderland.se wrote:
Hi,
Same issues again, but I think we found the drive that causes the
problems.
But this is causing problems as
Hi,
On 06 Sep 2014, at 13:53, Christian Balzer ch...@gol.com wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 13:37:25 +0200 Josef Johansson wrote:
Also putting this on the list.
On 06 Sep 2014, at 13:36, Josef Johansson jo...@oderland.se wrote:
Hi,
Same issues again, but I think we found the
FWI I did restart the OSDs until I saw a server that made impact. Until that
server stopped doing impact, I didn’t get lower in the number objects being
degraded.
After a while it was done with recovering that OSD and happily started with
others.
I guess I will be seeing the same behaviour when
We manage to go through the restore, but the performance degradation is still
there.
Looking through the OSDs to pinpoint a source of the degradation and hoping the
current load will be lowered.
I’m a bit afraid of doing the 0 to weight of an OSD, wouldn’t it be tough if
the degradation is
Hi,
On 06 Sep 2014, at 17:27, Christian Balzer ch...@gol.com wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 17:10:11 +0200 Josef Johansson wrote:
We manage to go through the restore, but the performance degradation is
still there.
Manifesting itself how?
Awful slow io on the VMs, and iowait,
Hello,
On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 17:41:02 +0200 Josef Johansson wrote:
Hi,
On 06 Sep 2014, at 17:27, Christian Balzer ch...@gol.com wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 17:10:11 +0200 Josef Johansson wrote:
We manage to go through the restore, but the performance degradation
is
Hi,
On 06 Sep 2014, at 18:05, Christian Balzer ch...@gol.com wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 17:52:59 +0200 Josef Johansson wrote:
Hi,
Just realised that it could also be with a popularity bug as well and
lots a small traffic. And seeing that it’s fast it gets popular until it
Hi,
On 06 Sep 2014, at 17:59, Christian Balzer ch...@gol.com wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 17:41:02 +0200 Josef Johansson wrote:
Hi,
On 06 Sep 2014, at 17:27, Christian Balzer ch...@gol.com wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 17:10:11 +0200 Josef Johansson wrote:
We manage
On 06 Sep 2014, at 19:37, Josef Johansson jo...@oderland.se wrote:
Hi,
Unfortunatly the journal tuning did not do much. That’s odd, because I don’t
see much utilisation on OSDs themselves. Now this leads to a network-issue
between the OSDs right?
To answer my own question. Restarted a
On 07 Sep 2014, at 04:47, Christian Balzer ch...@gol.com wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 19:47:13 +0200 Josef Johansson wrote:
On 06 Sep 2014, at 19:37, Josef Johansson jo...@oderland.se wrote:
Hi,
Unfortunatly the journal tuning did not do much. That’s odd, because I
don’t see much
Hi,
Sorry for the lack of information yesterday, this was solved after some 30
minutes, after having reloaded/restarted all osd daemons.
Unfortunately we couldn’t pin point it to a single OSD or drive, all drives
seemed ok, some had a bit higher latency and we tried to out / in them to see
if
Hello,
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 08:26:47 +0200 David wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for the lack of information yesterday, this was solved after
some 30 minutes, after having reloaded/restarted all osd daemons.
Unfortunately we couldn’t pin point it to a single OSD or drive, all
drives seemed ok, some had a
Only time I saw such behaviour was when I was deleting a big chunk of data
from the cluster: all the client activity was reduced, the op/s were almost
non-existent and there was unjustified delays all over the cluster. But all
the disks were somewhat busy in atop/iotstat.
On 5 September 2014
Hi,
We’re running a ceph cluster with version:
0.67.7-1~bpo70+1
All of a sudden we’re having issues with the cluster (running RBD images for
kvm) with slow requests on all of the OSD servers.
Any idea why and how to fix it?
2014-09-04 11:56:35.868521 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v12504451: 6860 pgs:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:02:13 +0200 David wrote:
Hi,
We’re running a ceph cluster with version:
0.67.7-1~bpo70+1
All of a sudden we’re having issues with the cluster (running RBD images
for kvm) with slow requests on all of the OSD servers. Any idea why and
how to fix it?
You give us
Just echoing what Christian said.
Also, iirc the currently waiting for subobs on [ could also mean a
problem on those as it waits for ack from them (I might remember wrong).
If that is the case you might want to check in on osd 13 37 as well.
With the cluster load and size you should not have
17 matches
Mail list logo
