On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Marcus Furlong wrote:
> On 9 February 2017 at 09:34, Trey Palmer wrote:
> > The multisite configuration available starting in Jewel sound more
> > appropriate for your situation.
> >
> > But then you need two separate clusters, each large enough to contain
> all o
On 9 February 2017 at 09:34, Trey Palmer wrote:
> The multisite configuration available starting in Jewel sound more
> appropriate for your situation.
>
> But then you need two separate clusters, each large enough to contain all of
> your objects.
On that note, is anyone aware of documentation th
The multisite configuration available starting in Jewel sound more
appropriate for your situation.
But then you need two separate clusters, each large enough to contain all
of your objects.
-- Trey
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Daniel Picolli Biazus
wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have been plan
Hi Daniel,
50 ms of latency is going to introduce a big performance hit though
things will still function. We did a few tests which are documented
at http://www.osris.org/performance/latency
thanks,
Ben
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Daniel Picolli Biazus
wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have been pl
Hi Guys,
I have been planning to deploy a Ceph Cluster with the following hardware:
*OSDs:*
4 Servers Xeon D 1520 / 32 GB RAM / 5 x 6TB SAS 2 (6 OSD daemon per server)
Monitor/Rados Gateways
5 Servers Xeon D 1520 32 GB RAM / 2 x 1TB SAS 2 (5 MON daemon/ 4 rados
daemon)
Usage: Object Storage o
