Re: [ceph-users] Nautilus minor versions archive

2019-10-01 Thread Volodymyr Litovka
On 02.10.2019 00:56, Paul Emmerich wrote: There's virtually no difference between 14.2.3 and 14.2.4, it's only a bug fix for running ceph-volume without a terminal on stderr on some environments. Nevetheless. There is one more minor change - kernel 5.0.xx -> 5.0.yy (which probably can imply

Re: [ceph-users] Nautilus minor versions archive

2019-10-01 Thread Paul Emmerich
There's virtually no difference between 14.2.3 and 14.2.4, it's only a bug fix for running ceph-volume without a terminal on stderr on some environments. Unrelated: Do you really want to run the RDMA messenger in production? I wouldn't dare if the system is in any way critical. Paul -- Paul Emm

Re: [ceph-users] Nautilus minor versions archive

2019-10-01 Thread Volodymyr Litovka
It's quite pity. We tested solution Ceph 14.2.3 + RDMA in lab, got it working, but at the moment of moving it to the production there was 14.2.4 and we got few hours outage trying to launch. On 02.10.2019 00:28, Paul Emmerich wrote: On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 11:21 PM Volodymyr Litovka wrote: Dear

Re: [ceph-users] Nautilus minor versions archive

2019-10-01 Thread Paul Emmerich
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 11:21 PM Volodymyr Litovka wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > is archive of previos ceph minor versions is available? no, because reprepro doesn't support that (yeah, that's clearly a solvable problem, but the current workflow just uses reprepro and one repository) Paul >

[ceph-users] Nautilus minor versions archive

2019-10-01 Thread Volodymyr Litovka
Dear colleagues, is archive of previos ceph minor versions  is available? To be more specific - I'm looking for 14.2.1 or 14.2.2 for Ubuntu, but @download.ceph.com only 14.2.4 is available. Thank you. -- Volodymyr Litovka "Vision without Execution is Hallucination." -- Thomas Edison ___