[ceph-users] OSD numbering

2013-10-30 Thread Glen Aidukas
I wanted to know, does the OSD numbering half to be sequential and what is the highest usable number (2^16 or 2^32)? The reason is, I would like to use a numbering convention that reflects the cluster number (assuming I will have more than one down the road; test, dev, prod), the host and disk

Re: [ceph-users] OSD numbering

2013-10-30 Thread Mike Lowe
You really should, I believe the osd number is used in computing crush. Bad things will happen if you don't use sequential numbers. On Oct 30, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Glen Aidukas gaidu...@behaviormatrix.com wrote: I wanted to know, does the OSD numbering half to be sequential and what is the

Re: [ceph-users] OSD numbering

2013-10-30 Thread Loic Dachary
OSD numbers are 2^32 On 30/10/2013 16:37, Glen Aidukas wrote: I wanted to know, does the OSD numbering half to be sequential and what is the highest usable number (2^16 or 2^32)? The reason is, I would like to use a numbering convention that reflects the cluster number (assuming I will