Hi,
BTW, is there a way how to achieve redundancy over multiple OSDs in one
box by changing CRUSH map?
Thank you
Jiri
On 20/01/2015 13:37, Jiri Kanicky wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the reply. That clarifies it. I thought that the redundancy
can be achieved with multiple OSDs (like multiple disks
Hi,
Thanks for the reply. That clarifies it. I thought that the redundancy
can be achieved with multiple OSDs (like multiple disks in RAID) in case
you don't have more nodes. Obviously the single point of failure would
be the box.
My current setting is:
osd_pool_default_size = 2
Thank you
J
You only have one osd node (ceph4). The default replication requirements
for your pools (size = 3) require osd's spread over three nodes, so the
data can be replicate on three different nodes. That will be why your pgs
are degraded.
You need to either add mode osd nodes or reduce your size setting
Hi.
I am just curious. This is just lab environment and we are short on
hardware :). We will have more hardware later, but right now this is all
I have. Monitors are VMs.
Anyway, we will have to survive with this somehow :).
Thanks
Jiri
On 20/01/2015 15:33, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
On 20
On 20 January 2015 at 14:10, Jiri Kanicky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> BTW, is there a way how to achieve redundancy over multiple OSDs in one
> box by changing CRUSH map?
>
I asked that same question myself a few weeks back :)
The answer was yes - but fiddly and why would you do that?
Its kinda breakin
Hi,
I just would like to clarify if I should expect degraded PGs with 11 OSD
in one node. I am not sure if a setup with 3 MON and 1 OSD (11 disks)
nodes allows me to have healthy cluster.
$ sudo ceph osd pool create test 512
pool 'test' created
$ sudo ceph status
cluster 4e77327a-118d-45
