Of course, but it means that in case of failure you can no longer trust
your data consistency and should recheck it against separately stored
checksums or so. I`m leaving aside such fact that Ceph will not probably
recover pool properly with replication number lower than 2 in many
cases. So general
On 15/11/2013 8:57 AM, Dane Elwell wrote:
[2] - I realise the dangers/stupidity of a replica size of 0, but some of the
data we wish
to store just isn’t /that/ important.
We've been thinking of this too. The application is storing boot-images, ISOs, local
repository mirrors etc where recovery
Hello,
We’ll be going into production with our Ceph cluster shortly and I’m looking
for some advice on the number of PGs per pool we should be using.
We have 216 OSDs totalling 588TB of storage. We’re intending on having several
pools, with not all pools sharing the same replica count - so, som
